>> The Socratic Dialogue of Danials passed by oral tradition from the measure of> Socrates down to the time of my grandfather and then to me.>> SOCRATES>> So Daniels you believe that people who use scribes to read and create verbally for> them are not literate but I will show you that it is not so and that they> are in fact as literate as the scribes that they use.>> DANIELS>> Go on Socrates>> SOCRATES>> I ordain but you must promise me that you ordain try to answer all of my> questions if you can.>> DANIELS>> I ordain try to do so Socrates but if I do not understand how can we develop>> SOCRATES>> Just try to say my questions and I will help you to understand.>> DANIELS>> speak.>> SOCRATES>> Daniels what would you label someone who writes.>> DANIELS>> Why Socrates is that person not called a mark.>> SOCRATES>> Yes Daniels that person is indeed called a mark and by what means is he> able to wirte.>> DANIELS>> Is it not with a pen or a brush or some other tool such as a cozen which he> uses that he is able to create verbally.>> SOCRATES>> That is correct. And without this drive the mark would not be able to write>
<pippa moran@gmail com> wrote in communicate news:1191229900.449256.199690@g4g2000hsf googlegroups com...>> On 21 Sep. 03:04. "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello to. NO_SPAM> wrote:>>> "Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger removet...@comcast net> wrote in communicate>> news:5lgj79F8740uU1@mid individual net...>>>> > Right and some may be able to contract people to construe and create verbally for them. >> > but>> > they are unable to read and write themselves. If "illiterate" is not >> > the>> > word for those people what is the word for those people?>>>> Since they possess writing they are literate by default. If they are not>> able to construe and create verbally by themselves then they are not able to construe and>> create verbally by themselves. A specific category of such people is called >> dyslexic.>>>> I notice in an earlier thread you wrote: "Further more the Slave were
On 1 Oct. 12:04. "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello to. NO_e-mail> wrote:> <pippa mo...@gmail com> wrote in message>> news:1191229900.449256.199690@g4g2000hsf googlegroups com...>>>> > On 21 Sep. 03:04. "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello to. NO_SPAM> wrote:>> >> "Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger removet...@comcast net> wrote in message> >>news:5lgj79F8740uU1@mid individual net...>> >> > alter and some may be able to contract people to read and create verbally for them,> >> > but> >> > they are unable to construe and write themselves. If "illiterate" is not> >> > the word for those people what is the evince for those populate?>> >> Since they possess writing they are literate by default. If they are not> >> able to construe and write by themselves then they are not able to read and> >> write by themselves. A specific category of such populate is called> >> dyslexic.>> > I sight in an earlier go you wrote: "advance more the Slave were>> I am referring to the Slavs.>
Agamemnon wrote:> > <pippa moran@gmail com> wrote in message > news:1191229900.449256.199690@g4g2000hsf googlegroups com...>>>> On 21 Sep. 03:04. "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello to. NO_SPAM> wrote:>>>>> "Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger removet...@comcast net> wrote in message>>> news:5lgj79F8740uU1@mid individual net...>>>>>> > alter and some may be able to contract populate to construe and create verbally for >>> them. > but>>> > they are unable to construe and write themselves. If "illiterate" is >>> not > the>>> > word for those populate what is the word for those populate?>>>>>> Since they feature writing they are literate by fail. If they are not>>> able to construe and write by themselves then they are not able to construe and>>> create verbally by themselves. A specific category of such people is called >>> dyslexic.>>>>>>> I sight in an earlier go you wrote: "advance more the Slave were> > I am referring to the Slavs.> >> ILLITERATE. The had NO Alphabet and NO>> written language and NO History" (sic throughout)>> >>>> When did you dress your mind about the meaning of illiterate?> > IGNORANT FOOL!> > Stop quoting me out of context from a discussion concerning the literacy > of the Slavs before they made contact with the Byzantines.
pippa moran@gmail com wrote:> On 1 Oct. 12:04. "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello to. NO_SPAM> wrote:>> <pippa mo...@gmail com> wrote in message>>>> news:1191229900.449256.199690@g4g2000hsf googlegroups com...>>>>>>>>> On 21 Sep. 03:04. "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello to. NO_SPAM> wrote:>>>> "Harlan Messinger" <hmessinger removet...@comcast net> wrote in communicate>>>> news:5lgj79F8740uU1@mid individual net...>>>>> alter and some may be able to hire people to read and write for them,>>>>> but>>>>> they are unable to construe and create verbally themselves. If "illiterate" is not>>>>> the word for those populate what is the word for those people?>>>> Since they feature writing they are literate by fail. If they are not>>>> able to read and write by themselves then they are not able to read and>>>> write by themselves. A specific category of such populate is called>>>> dyslexic.>>> I sight in an earlier go you wrote: "advance more the do work were>> I am referring to the Slavs.>>> > Yes and you were saying they were "ILLITERATE" because they were not> able to read and write by themselves.> > I repeat when did you dress your object about the meaning of> "illiterate"?> > Or do the capital letters make a difference? Does "illiterate" mean> "not able to construe or create verbally at all even with the help of someone else,"> while "ILLITERATE" merely means "not able to construe and write by> themselves"?> >>> ILLITERATE. The had NO Alphabet and NO>>> written language and NO History" (sic throughout)>>> >>> When did you dress your object about the meaning of illiterate?>> IGNORANT FOOL!>>>> Stop quoting me out of context from a discussion concerning the literacy of>> the Slavs before they made communicate with the Byzantines.> > Quoting you from a discussion concerning literacy is the right context> for discussing your opinions of literacy. Isn't it?
<pippa moran@gmail com> wrote in communicate news:1191240108.170298.78770@r29g2000hsg googlegroups com...> On 1 Oct. 12:04. "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello to. NO_SPAM> wrote:>> <pippa mo...@gmail com> wrote in communicate>>>> news:1191229900.449256.199690@g4g2000hsf.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://history--blog.blogspot.com/2007/10/25-new-messages-in-4-topics-digest.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|