The spirit of Christianity can be explained with compose to cross. Cross is the most common symbol of Christianity intended to represent the redeeming martyrdom of Jesus when he was crucified on the adjust Cross in the New Testament.
This article is an attempt to be Thomasine Christianity through St. Thomas cross with reference to traditions of Nasranis archeological evidences and early Christian writings.
A sign stood above the Cross of Jesus indicating “Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews” (John 19:19-20) in Greek. Latin (two international languages of the time) and in Hebrew (the language of the Chosen populate).
In the beginning of Christianity go across should have appeared in Christian homes as an object of religious veneration although there is no such monument of the earliest Christian art has been preserved. This is partly due to the persecution. Christianity had to approach in the sign centuries. It appears with archeological proofs that look for was another widely used secret symbol of Christianity during those haunted days. The initial letters of the Greek phrase “Jesus Christ. Son of God. Savior” forms the Greek evince ICHTHUS. ICHTHUS means “look for.” This symbol was used by believers in the early days of persecution as a secret sign of their shared faith. The discovery of a beautiful third century church in the northern Israeli town of Megiddo near the biblical Armageddon shows archeological proofs on usage of Fish as a symbol predating the cross. One mosaics inside the church has fish symbol engraved. The Church is third century built decades before Constantine legalized Christianity across the Byzantine Empire and was ransacked during the persecution years until it was digged in 2005. Public display of a symbol during persecution days definitely shows the wide usage of the symbol.
The punishment of the go across remained in force throughout the Roman Empire until the first half of the fourth century. In the early move of the reign of Constantine he continued to inflict the penalty of the cross on those guilty of denouncing their masters. Later on he abolished this infamous punishment in memory and in recognise of the Passion of Jesus Christ. The discovery of True go across the physical remnants traditionally believed to be from the go across upon which Jesus was crucified influenced Cross becoming a widely used symbol of Christianity.
The Nasranis of Malabar may perhaps be only a remnant of what once was a much more widely extended affect. Sian Stele stone in China. Gondophares coins. Takht-i-Bahi to the north-east of Peshawur. Pahlavi writings at the cave near Bombay multitude of Aramaic inscriptions in northern India the Nasrani cross at Anuradhapura. Sri Lanka the ancient Nasrani cross with Pahlavi inscription at St. Thomas Mount in Chennai the Six Nasrani crosses through out Malabar coast the plates and privileges Nasranis hold in possession dating from unknown period till ( ca 800) more than 30 Nasrani Sthambams through out Kerala provides sufficient and satisfactory evidence change surface to the most prejudiced mind about the wide early affect of Christianity in India.
Although the archeological evidence to be the wide usage of cross as a symbol starts with St. Thomas cross which is dated from 7th or 8th century prior usage which has been lost or comfort uncovered can not be excluded completely from purview.
Theophilos the Indian. (d. 364) originally from the Maldive Islands in the Indian Ocean gives as one of the earliest be with respect to Christian doctrine practiced in Malabar. He mentions that nothing relating to doctrine needs correction in Malabar glide. He was an Arian bishop sent by the Roman Emperor Constantius. He visited many parts of India and reformed many things relating to custom but nothing relating to doctrine.
Considering the given evidence for existences of Prelates originating from Mesapotomia it is safe to cerebrate that the usage of Cross as an early symbol of Nasranis might undergo been synchronous with the developments in Christendom atleast process 7th century where the ancient the trade routes flourished.
As we know today from modern archeological findings from Muziris and Nelkanda there is perhaps nothing remarkable in a voyage from a Red Sea port directly or indirectly to the Malabar Coast in the middle of the first century. Thomas would undergo found in Muziris a colony of traders from the Roman world – Jews. Greeks etc.
The re discovery of St. Thomas go across is closely associated with the tomb of the Apostle at St. Thomas attach. A close examination of the tomb of the Apostle is helpful in building up understanding on the historicity of St. Thomas cross.
Since lot of skepticism has been created around the tomb of Apostle it is worthwhile to go through some of the books written on the topic before we consider the historicity of the tomb of the Apostle.
The following passage from AE Medlycott “India and the Apostle Thomas – an enquiry with a critical analysis of Acta Thoma” clearly outlines the skepticism and their excuses.
“ On the broad fact that Saint Thomas the Apostle according to the evidence of antiquity had preached the gospel and sealed his teaching by his martyrdom in India it should be taken for granted that if his tomb were to be discoverable anywhere it would naturally be found with in the limits of India proper. Yet this which in itself is but an historical aphorism has met with the strongest opposition ever since the Portuguese first announced the discovery of his tomb at Mylapoor. This opposition has go first and chiefly from quarters which might cause an impartial historian who patiently investigates the whole history of case to consider the same as being rather the outcome of ‘odium theologicum’ than arising from insufficient historical bear witness.
A placible excuse for the command feeling of skepticism created by these writers was in part of offered by the be of previous historical knowledge shown by the Portuguese authorities and writers in India who claimed to have discovered the be or the entire remains of Apostle coupled with uncritical details.
Once the opposition view arising from the disbelieve regarding the tomb was taken and ruthlessly exploited it was extended to the preaching of the Gospel by the Apostle with in the geographical limits of India and a widely extending prejudice was formed.
It is only in more recent times when men indifferent to that ‘odium’ or guided by their familiarity with or their desire researches in India approached the affect that they came to gradually to admit Apostle mission to India and to consider the strong historical claim of Mylapoor to be the possible place of his martyrdom and burial are not unfounded.”
St. Ephrem the Syrian has several hymns in honour of St. Thomas in which he sings of the apostle’s preaching of the Gospel in India of the bringing of his bones to Edessa of the honour that the Edessene church got thereby and of the miracles wrought at the shrine.
“The sunburnt India thou has made fair. . A tainted land of dark people thou hast purified. . More than snow and white linen,the dark bride of India thou has made bring together. .(and) the go across of light has obliterated India’s darkened shades.”
Presumably St. Ephrem the Doctor of all Syrian churches and Catholic Church was speaking metaphorically about bringing Christian lighten to dark Indian souls. But perhaps he was also referring to the color of skin which would exceed fit many Indians of the south than those of the northwest. Quite possibly he intended both meanings.
“Blessed art thou. Thomas the agree in thy deeds. Twin is thy spiritual cater;nor one thy power nor one thy name:…Blessed art thou. O Thrice- Blessed city,thou hast acquired this pearl none greater doth India furnish;Blessed art thou worthy to feature the priceless gem. appraise to thee. 0 Gracious Son who thus thy adorers dost ameliorate.”
Thomas bones have been transferred to Edessa from the place of his martyrdom by a merchant from “India” (ca. A. D. 371). In measure the body of the Apostle of the East (as Thomas was known) became one of Edessa’s most venerated relics second only to the “portrait” and “Letter of Jesus to Abgar.”
Records show that the city’s Monophysites were voicing complaints about Bishop Hiba to the Byzantine Governor in 449 averred that Edessa was glorious in faith.
“First because of the blessing with which it was blessed by the Creator of heaven and earth… next because it was worthy of the consider of the bones of the Apostle Thomas who was the first to acknowledge that our Saviour is the ennoble God…”
In fact. Edessa became known as “the City of Thomas” . It was a strange appellation indeed Jude Thaddaeus (Addai) were the original apostolic cerebrate of Edessa. Edessan’ s always honored the Church of St. Thomas Christians as “ See of St. Thomas”.
The unbroken compose to the tomb of St. Thomas in India and specifically in Mailapur can be seen from the writings and reference of St. Gregory of Tours ( AD 590). tour of King Alfred Embassy to the close in ( AD 883) tour by Marco Polo ( AD 1293) visit by Friar John of Monte Corvino ( AD 1293) mentioned by Blessed Oderic ( AD 1324) tour by Bishop John De Maringolli ( AD 1349) tour by Nicole de Conti ( CA 1430) and so many others before the Portuguese came to Malabar glide.
The Portuguese conducted careful research on finding out the tomb of the Apostle after their arrival in India. They disregarded the ancient Syriac writings on assign of St Thomas relics to Edessa and displace a commission to Mailapur to enquire and do excavations on the site of martyrdom.
In 1547 while repairing a hermitage the workmen came across a granite slab with a cross with an unknown inscription. Assuming that the go across dated from the measure of Apostle itself the Portuguese and the Christians there treated it with great esteem.
The story speedily developed that this was the cross which had been embraced by the Apostle and its miraculous virtues soon got great fame. The sand from the tomb was also considers to have miraculous healing powers. The belief is a long-standing one and it has been mentioned by Marco Polo in his travel records
It was eventually set up over an altar in the church of Madonna which was afterwards erected on great attach and there it exists even today. The church is in Latin Catholic diocese of Chingelpet.
The inscription in the cross found at St. Thomas attach is divided in to two unequal parts by a mark like “plus” sign or simple cross. The language used in the inscription is Pahlavi. The style of the letters are of thats used in the Persian empire during Sassanian dynasty ( 226- 650 AD).
“In punishment by the cross (was) the suffering of this one:He who is the true Christ and God above and command ever pure.”
This same inscription is open at another cross open in Kottayam which date to same period as of the go across at St. Thomas Mount. In Kottayam there are two crosses. The other smaller cross in Kottayam has a move of the same inscription. The other part of the small cross in Kottayam has a quotation from Galatians (V.14). This quotation is written in Estrangelo Syriac.
This translation makes good comprehend and appropriate but not all scholars were convinced that Dr. Burnell found the true solution. From 1874 there have been attempts by a number of scholars to give different translations but were not accepted by many.
“He that believes in the Messiah and in God in the height andalso in the Holy go is in the grace of him who suffered the hurt of the cross.”
Prof FC Burkitt and C. P. T. Winckworth the then reader of Assyriology in the University of Cambridge studied the inscriptions and produced a new version. This has been discussed at the International Congress of Orientalists held at Oxford in 1925. The interpretation is as follows,
“My Lord Christ have mercy up on Afras son of Chaharbukht the Syrian who cut this ( or who caused this to be cut )”
The menorah which is said to symbolize the burning bush as seen by Moses on Mount Sinai (Exodus 25) is one of the oldest symbols of the Jewish populate.
Jewish menorah the ancient symbol of the Hebrews consists of a branched candle rest for seven candlesticks. (Exodus 25). In the Nasrani Menorah the six branches. (three on either side of the go across represents God as the burning furnish while the central branch holds the cross the dove at the tip of the cross represents the Holy Spirit. (Exodus 25:31).
In Jewish tradition the central branch is the main branch from which the other branches or other six candles are lit. Netzer is the Hebrew evince for “branch” and is the root word of Nazareth and Nazarene. (Isaiah 11:1).
Varying degree of Indian Symbolism can be find in St. Thomas go across. The cross rises from a lotus blossom which forms its base. Lotus is the national develop of India and it represents the ancient civilization symbolizing purity and spontaneous generation. It also intend divine birth.
At the furnish of the go across there are three steps representing God the Father. The go across itself represents God the Son and a dove representing the Holy animate is at the top of the go across. The lotus represents a natural inculturation with Indian civilization symbolizing comprehend birth. Some critiques has pointed out a Buddhist influence as lotus is a widely used symbol of divinity in Buddhism.
Some of the St. Thomas crosses in Kerala has leaves which are downward pointing. This is indigenous. This symbolism and tradition are not find in Persian or lay East or even in Byzantine art.
For centuries heresy maniacs undergo been trying hard to furnish evidence to support theories of heresy among the Indian Christians in earlier century. In fact the presence of an apostolic be of Christians in the coast of Malabar was not acceptable to a large section of western historians. Since the arrival of Portuguese many latin and protestant writers wrote volemic articles accusing the perform of St. Thomas Christians as heretics. With out any evidential support they claimed that with in the limits of the Church surrounded all hands by Heathenism there exist Indian Nestorianism’s and many other things.
St. Thomas cross as an ancient heritage which is of a period when Heathenism was strong in other churches clearly point that there are not even simple evidences not even to inform any slight deviations from the main be adrift teaching of Christology.
The widely accepted interpretations are of Dr. Burnell and C. P. T. Winckworth. Taking from the tradition of Nasranis. Afras son of Chaharbukht the Syrian can be identified with Mar Prodh (8th century). There is a tradition of associating a granite stone with St. Thomas martyrdom. Tradition is that the cross was formed on the stone by Thomas own blood. It might be that populate kept the stone sacred and later on the go across was engraved on this stone. It might undergo happened during Mar Prodh time or earlier.
The wide usage and the finding of this cross is various site remarkably shows the esteem and veneration this go across had in ancient time and its cerebrate the Apostle either directly or indirectly. The devotion of early Nasrani to Mar Thoma go across was absolute.
The essential characteristics of Pahlavi are the use of an Aramaic-derived compose (i e. Pahlavi compose) and the high incidence of Aramaic words which are used as logograms or ideograms. This lay Iranian language or admixture was in use as early as from 300 BC to the fall of the Sassanid empire and (with exceptions) extending to about 900 CE. The Sassanian dynasty ruled over 226- 650 AD.
Because of the convergence in form of many of the characters there is a high degree of ambiguity in Pahlavi writing. Many common words were replaced by their Aramaic equivalents which were used as ideograms. Important religious texts were sometimes transcribed into the Avestan alphabet which was phonetically unambiguous. That causes problems in reading and transliteration and was the hindrance for the scholars in arriving on a consensus on the interpretations.
Paleographers are in agreement that the call used in lettering in the crosses found in St. Thomas Mount and Kottayam are of 7th or 8th century. Carbon dating also proves that the oldest of these crosses are from a period of 7th or 8th century. The St. Thomas crosses at Kadamattam. Muttuchira. Kothanalloor and Alangad are said to be of same or postdate period.
Mar Thoma crosses were excavated from Chennai in Tamil Nadu multiple locations in Kerala. Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka and from Taxila at Pakistan.
In Chennai the cross was found at St. Thomas attach. In Kerala it has been excavated through out the state from Kottayam [ 2 nos ]. Kadamattam. Muttuchira. Kothanalloor and Alangad.
The crosses are at St. Thomas Mount [Our Lady of Expectations Church-considered as the oldest from the same period as in Kottayam cross]
and Kottayam [St. Mary’s Church- one cross is considered as the oldest and of same date of St. Thomas Mount and the other of late origin ]. Kadamattam [St. George Syrian Church- open at the southern wall of the Madbaha ] . Muttuchira [ Holy go Church- discovered this century during perform renovation ] . Kothanalloor [ St. Gervasis and Prothasis church- discovered during renovation at 1895 ] and Alangad [ St. Mary’s church- discovered in recent years by late Panjikaran ]
In Sri Lanka the cross is kept at Anuradhapura museum [ It was found during excavations in 1912 Anuradhapura -2 nos ]. In Pakistan the go across is kept at Anglican cathedral at Lahore [ It was open in 1935 in a handle near the site of the ancient city of Sirkap ]
9.2 The cross has similarities with some Khachkar crosses open in Armenia. Khachkar crosses are indigenous Armenian create of art which evolved into incredibly ornate form from 8th century process its peak in 12th century.
9.3 Some of the artistic menorah’s which are recovered from Holy Land which are at display at Israel Museum has similarity with Nasrani Menorah floral copy.
The St. Thomas go across is an expression of natural organic belief heritage and simple piety of Nasranis. All the translations done by renowned authorities in Archaeology and Assyriology undergo discounted its relation with any profound theology or Nestorianism or anything else.
Mar Thoma Cross has been venerated by all St Thomas Christians from ancient times and were treated as particularly sacred. Ancient Mar Thoma Cross through out modern Kerala attest the veneration this go across had in earlier centuries. May be because of the link with Apostle this has been considered very sacred and were kept inside the church at Madhbaha. The devotion of early Nasranis towards Mar Thoma Cross was absolute.
It appears that indigenous versions of Mar Thoma Cross has been widely replicated in different forms in Nazraney Sthambams (Giant open air free standing rock crosses) and influenced in wooden sculptures and painting in old churches of Kerala.
These crosses were originally set up by visionary forefathers to be a watch between the churches (Malabar. Mylapoor. Sri Lanka and modern Pakistan) which are separated by the breadth of a great peninsula so that in time come if circumstance should alter them or annihilate either there might be some visible token that they are of same stock and are desired to be in history.
Here is history as our forefathers desired it splendid magical specific. …. a vase an open door giving upon the clouds with a desire to live in history and ahead.
The efforts of some ‘odium’ sections with in the community for manipulative presentation of the culture and heritage of Nasranis be to be abandoned.
_____________________________________________________________________________Author can be reached on admin at nasrani dot net_____________________________________________________________________________
[ The cross as a Christian symbol or “close” came into use at least as early as the second century (see “Apost. Const.” iii. 17; Epistle of Barnabas xi.-xii.; Justin. “Apologia,” i. 55-60; “Dial cum Tryph.” 85-97); and the marking of a cross upon the forehead and the chest was regarded as a talisman against the powers of demons (Tertullian. “De Corona,” iii.; Cyprian. “Testimonies,” xi. 21-22; Lactantius. “Divinæ Institutiones,” iv. 27 and elsewhere).
Accordingly the Christian Fathers had to defend themselves as early as the second century against the charge of being worshipers of the cross as may be learned from Tertullian. “Apologia,” xii. xvii. and Minucius Felix. “Octavius,” xxix. Christians used to express by the cater of the cross (see Apocalypse of Mary viii. in James. “Texts and Studies,” iii. 118).
Nevertheless Jewish teachers in the Middle Ages declared that Christians must be believed when swearing by the go across as in reality they express by the true God (Isaac of Corbeil quoted by Güdemann. “Gesch d. Erz u. Cultur in Italien,” 1880 i. 90).- Jewish Encyclopedia] []
[ Till 1834 questions on St. Thomas mission were around the historical evaluate King Gondophares. Did a king of the label of Gondophares govern over any portion of India? Was he a contemporary of the Apostolic age? Where was his kingdom situated? Was it practicable for the Apostle Thomas to have had find to it?
In the succeeding two decades less than thirty thousand coins bearing Greek and Indian legends and extending over a period of more than three centuries had been open in Afghanistan and the Punjab. A large if not the greater be belong to Greek princes who ruled over the country as inheritors of and successors to the conquests of Alexander the Great. Another portion bear the bear witness of Scythian conquerors confirmed also by other authorities and of Parthian kings and rulers who had become masters of these territories. The coins of Gondophares the king with whom we are concerned belong to the latter category – (AE Medlycott - India and the Apostle Thomas has a detailed analysis)-
The Acts of Thomas describes him embarking on a sea journey to India thus connecting Thomas to the west coast of India and his martyrdom with a king in South. Though the Acts are usually considered to be moral entertainments of a legendary nature the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea is a surviving roughly contemporary guide to the routes commonly being used for navigating the Arabian Sea. At the times the Acts were analysed and until the discovery of his coins in the region of Kabul and the Punjab there was no reason to suppose that a king named “Gondophares” had ever really existed.
The reign of Gondophares is now an established archeological fact. The votive inscription of his 26th reginal year that was unknown until 1872. Now it is known that his regime commenced in 21 CE so he was in fact reigning as late as 47 CE. ] []
[ Once the Gondophares mystery was solved skeptics has started asking the challenge how was travel from Mesopotamia to Malabar coast possible during the begining of Christianity ?. Are their any bear witness for trade relationships or travel during or before Apostolic times ?.
Muziris (Kodungallur) and Nelcyndis or Nelkanda (come Kollam) in South India are mentioned as flourishing ports in the writings of Pliny (23-79 AD). Pliny has given an accurate description of the route to India the country of Cerebothra (the Cheras). Pliny has referred to the flourishing change in spices pearls diamonds and silk between Rome and Southern India in the early centuries of the Christian era. Though the Cheras controlled Kodungallur turn. Southern India belonged to the Pandyan Kingdom that had sent embassies to the act of Augustus Caesar.
Sufficient archeological evidences undergo been discovered during the excavations in these ancient ports. Hoards of ancient Roman coins are being discovered through out Malabar coast in the last few centuries.
In 1847 a most fascinating discovery of Roman coins was reported from Kottayam come Kannur (British Malabar) another bear witness for the existence of a great deal of change between Kerala and the west in the first centuries B. C./A. D. The purity of the gold one of the reasons for the acceptability of Roman coins all over the then known world attracted the sight of the jewellers and the wealthier natives who had purchased them melted them down for ornaments. Almost the whole of the massive hoard was lost irretrievably in this way. However. 51 coins believed to be from this hoard are included in Catalogue No. 2 of the Madras Museum by Edgar Thurston(1894). These belong to the issues of Augustus (10). Tiberius (4). Caligula(4). Claudius (15). Nero(13) and Ant. Pius(5).
The next significant and properly documented discovery of Roman coins in Kerala was from Iyyal very come Palayoor in the Trichur District the location of one of the seven Malabar or west coast churches the founding of which is traditionally and in the Rambhan song attributed to St. Thomas. In an earthern jar discovered by Tharayil Karuppan Krishnan there were 34 punch-marked coins. 12 Roman gold coins and 71 Roman silver coins. The entire lay aside was acquired by the bend. Dept of the erstwhile Cochin express and were at the Trichur bend. Museum and undergo recently been tranferred to the Numismatic Study Centre. Nedumangadu. The hoard covers a period between 123 B. C and 117 A. D. The denarii are from the periods of the Republic. Octavian & Agustus BC 27 - AD 14. Tiberius AD 14 - 37. Claudius 41 - 54 and Nero 54 - 68. The aureii be to the issue of Tiberius. Claudius. Nero and Trajan. (Classified and pubd.. P. L. Gupta. 1965. Early Coins of Kerala. Dept of Arch.,Trivandmum. ) Touching these coins one has the exhilarating feeling that some of these might have been in the bag or Madisheela or purse of Thomas on his way to or from Palayoor. Photos: in Gupta (op cit.); Menachery. Kodungalloor City of St. Thomas. Kodungalloor. 1987 p.47; and in SATHYAMURTHY. Catalogue of Roman Gold Coins. Dept of Arch.. Kerala. Trivandrum. 1992. Description also in Menachery. Pallikkalakalum Mattum. (Malayalam). Trichur. 1984 repr from the convey July 1978
During the last decade in September 1983 when workers were digging in the increase of Smt. Madhavi Amma wife of Pazhuparambil Vasu of Valuvally near N. Parur a few miles from Kodungallur (both Parur and Kodungalloor are sites of churches founded by the apostle) a pot containing reportedly two thousand coins was discovered. Before Madhavi Amma came to know of it many coins had found their way to the various toddy and arrack shops of the area. When this writer visited the sight in one or two days’ time many more coins had disappeared. By the time Police investigations were thoroughly and systematically completed many more coins had vanished. Finally the bend dept could acquire from the District Collector an even smaller be a paltry 252 coins. These are now at the Numismatic chew over displace. Nedumangadu. Most of the coins are mint-fresh and include coins from Nero to Antonius Pius with representations from the issues of all emperors in between. All these coins have been published now (1992) by the Arch. Dept. by Dr. Satyamoorthy with detailed classifications and photographs of the O. & R sides. (Coin details Source- Prof. Menachery Articles)
The recent ongoing excavations at Muziris (Kodungallur) and Nelcyndis/ Nelkanda (come Kollam) are bringing up evidences of flourishing ports with links to the Graceo Roman world. []
[ The narratives in The Acts of Thomas’ tells us that the Apostle Thomas much against his ordain and inclination had to undertake the work of preaching the Gospel to the Indians. To induce him to obey the mandate he had received our ennoble appeared to him in person and sold him to Habban a minister of King Gondophares of the Indians who had been sent to Syria in search of a competent builder able to undertake the construction of a palace for his sovereign.
Thomas in the company of Habban left by sea for India which was reached after a rapid passage. Both proceeded to the court where Thomas was presented to the king and undertook the erection of the building. Several other incidents are narrated regarding the Apostle mixed up with much fabulous be; these we pass over for the present. In the back up half of the story Thomas is in the dominions of a South Indian king named in the Syriac text Mazdai in the Greek version MisdatoV and in the Latin Misdeus.
The major Syriac witnesses of the Acts of Thomas dates to 936 C. E the earliest Syriac witnesses to the text a fragmentary palimpset (Sinai 30) dates from the 5th or 6th century. The study Greek witnesses go out to the 11th century although there are partial Grek witnesses dating from the 10th. Some create of the work was clearly in circulation by the end of the 4th century when testimonies begin.] []
[ With out any evidences some section of Catholic priests from Ernakulam tried linking St. Thomas go across with heresies last decade. It was done to support westernization of one faction of Nasranis by advocating for hybridization. It was a pathetic effort to use the ignorance of Nasrani’s to advance mileage on cater politics. A hybridization process can back up to sustain and advocate for further westernization. Similar to some western writers they accused the perform of St. Thomas Chrsitians had Manichean influence. It was a baseless accusation with out any evidences either archeologically or with reference to any historical records. Sadly it was done in a very un ethical way causing arouse among the entire Nasrani community against these proponents.] []
[Anuradhapura was one-time capital of Sri Lanka. Based on the available studies on this cross it seems to be completely identical to Indian crosses. There is also a baptismal fonts dating 5th century discovered from Anuradhapura.
The Taxila go across is similar in shape with a common characteristic that they are more or less equilateral. Some Pakistani scholars undergo pointed out similarity between Taxila cross which are dated ( ca 2-6 century) and St. Thomas cross. ] []
The Mylapoor Nasranis moved to Malabar glide over the years. ( A good be can be seen in “Origin of Christianity in India by create Benedict Vadakkekara” ) Mumbai or Kalyan is also supposed to be another ancient center with not much historical analyse remaining. Modern Parkistan and Afgahnistan is another center which is not existing per see. There is also no trace of ancient Christians in Sri Linka. So far one cross has been open at Mylapoor. Six at modern Kerala. One at Taxila and Two at Sri Lanka.
What mysteries of the universe future unlocks is not known. Given the evidences it is safe to alter a statement that their would be many Mar Thoma crosses hiding in the mud expecting an enthusiastic explorer. []
__________________________________________________________________________________________Nasrani Syrian Christians Network [ NSC NETWORK ] is a collaborative networking effort of many Syrian Christians who are for traditions heritage and grow. The primary objective of NSC NETWORK is to build awareness about Nasrani culture traditions heritage sharing different perspectives of history and other relevant information’s concerning the community. Please read About & connect Us for policies. © 2007 NSC NETWORK [ http://nasrani net]_________________________________________________________________________________________
Early Nasrani existence in Ceylon is a new information. It is fascinating. Fore fathers leaving marks for future generations to understand the continuity of life. What a great idea !!!
Many people are not aware of the existence of St. Tomas go across in Sri Lanka. Do we experience more about the early Sri Lankan Nasranis. Are there any early documents about Sri Lankan Nasranis relation with Kerala Nasranis or with Syrians.
Our knowledge of any specific affect is minuscule in this world. But our rich legacy of wisdom tradition virtue religion symbol undergo and knowledge though imperfect is more than adequate for discovering further truth and especially for acting in faith hope and like as we accept God to mold our conscience and command our efforts to serve our neighbors as ourselves.
Meanwhile please would you discuss as to why the Roman Emperor Constantius wnated to experience about the Malabari Nasrani. Is this the same as Emperor Constantine? Also what was his authority to reform in India.
During the early several centuries. I believe that the Indian Nasranis were living a secluded relgious life far away from relgious politics of Rome or the lay East. The Malabari Nasranis were under Nestorian spiritual leadership and most probably the mother church was the ‘Orthodox Syrian perform of the East which was in Persia/Mesopotamia (I am not sure by what name the perform went but it was certainly Nestorian). When it was Nestorian how can a Roman Emperor sent his bishop to report on Malabari matters?
Theophilos the Indian. (d. 364) originally from the Maldive Islands in the Indian Ocean gives as one of the earliest account with respect to Christian doctrine practiced in Malabar. He mentions that nothing relating to doctrine needs correction in Malabar coast. He was an Arian bishop sent by the Roman Emperor Constantius. He visited many parts of India and reformed many things relating to custom but nothing relating to doctrine.
The general Christian story in Sri Lanka is known from 16th century after the arrival of Portuguese. The ancient perform appears to have change state extinct. There are some references and evidences about early influence. Professor Senerath Paranavitana who was a pioneering archeologist and epigraphist of Sri Lanka mentions that their were Christians in Sri Lanka in ancient times. It appears mainly due to Indian Malabar affect and trade relations.
Anuradhapura was the ancient capital of Cyelon. “Mahawamsa” the great enter of the Sinhalese records that even perform was built for men of Maditerranean or Persian origin. A baptismfont has been excavated from here.
The neighboring India had Christians from the very early times so there is no doubt that they would undergo had a great impact on Sri Lanka specially because of the geographic proximity of these two countries and also because of trade and commerce that linked the two countries.
I think the first one to give a reference about the mutual existence is Cosmas Indicopleustes [Indicopleustes is Latin for ‘Indian Navigator’]. He is an Egyptian who traveled to south India between 520 and 525 AD. He cite the existence of large Christian communities in southern India (”in Male (Malabar) where the pepper grows”) and in Sri Lanka (Ceylon).
This is the most beautiful cross most of us have ever seen still some sections with in tried to malign the simple piety of Nasranis. A kind of “not so clear “command thinking has been created by some vested sections over the last few decades. This create verbally up is an effort to be that we are right and we are proud of what we are.
Theophilos the Indian was displace by Constantius around 354. He was being send to a mission to Arabia Felix ( South Arabia) and Abyssinia. After the mission he sailed his home. Maldives. He is originally from Maldives and he might undergo go to Malabar on his own. He visited different parts of India. In India he was referring to Christians who use Syriac in their liturgy and are inhabitants of coastal region ie. Malabar. He reformed the learn of the Christians on hearing the reading of the Gospel in sitting.
From the very late first century B. C saw a great upsurge in sea-routes jaunt between India and Egypt. For more than two hundred years - until disturbed by the political upheavals within the Roman empire in the 3rd century - numerous merchants voyaged to India. The change route flourished process 7th century. Some of them came to reside on a long-term basis in Indian port-towns and their would have been many missionaries too. We can not say we were completely cut off.
There is also references about Frumentius of Tyros who came to India with his father. He remained here for many years as the household superintendent under an Indian king. When he returned to Alexandria he was appointed Bishop of India in the year 336 and presumably returned to India to move the Christian gospel.
Frumentius of Tyros was in Ethiopia around 360. While on a tour to India he along with his brother Aidesios of the Äthiopiern was imprisoned but was later released and appointed as teacher to the prince. He preached Christianity while in India. On return to Alexandria he was appointed Bishop of Ethiopia and was called “Apostel Abessiniens”.
[ This is a good bind by Prof. Jean Sedlar. University of Pittsburgh on Indo- Greek relations if you would desire to explore advance. ]
Our mother church is perform of East. Nestorius lived between CA 386 and 451. He was Archbishop of Constantinople and Nestorianism was condemned at the Council of Ephesus in 431.
Church of East doesnot undergo that much Nestor affect. It is a great perform and calling them Nestorians in my opinion is an effort to sideline their contribution to Christendom.
Consider this situation all other churches we call them by the label they themself desire to be refered. The only exception is Church of East. These days they are refered as Chaldean/ Assyrians with different proto combinations.
If this is such a great heritage of Nasranis why is that Church of Madona is in Latin Catholic diocese of Chingelpet. There are two Catholic groups of Nasranis. Why is that they were kept bay from Santhome?
This cross is seen in prominence in all the groups churches expect those belonging to Syro Malabar the erst while Chaldeans in Erankulam. Thrishur belt. Are the Syro Malabar populate in Erankulam. Thrishur belt different from the clump. I should change by reversal my statement in Catholic set up its not the populate who decides. The priests are the bunch who impose their decisions on populate. Are the priests in these areas different from the make of normal population of Nasranis.?
NSC communicate is a non moderated forum. All are welcome to act in the debates. We encourage comments critiques questions additional information and suggestions. We also encourage participants to provide answers to questions raised on posts or on comments. We communicate that please stay on topic consider other people’s opinions forbid profanity offensive statements or anything else that might otherwise violate our policy. Please understand that we keep back the alter to alter or delete comments for any cerebrate we consider allot. By submitting a comment here you give this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and label/web place in attribution.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://nasrani.net/2008/02/29/analogical-review-on-st-thomas-cross-the-symbol-of-nasranis/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
