Released - Agenda for the Democratic National Convention for 2008: 7:00 P. M. Opening flag burning. 7:15 P. M. assure of allegiance to U. N. 7:30 P. M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast 7:30 till 8:00 P. M. Nonreligious prayer and worship. Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton. 8:00 P. M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast. 8:05 P. M. Ceremonial channelise hugging. 8:15- 8:30 P. M. Gay Wedding—Barney stamp Presiding. 8:30 P. M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast. 8:35 P. M. remove Saddam collect. Cindy Sheehan—Susan Sarandon. 9:00 P. M. Keynote speech. The proper etiquette for yield—French President Jacques Chirac 9:15 P. M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast. 9:20 P. M. Collection to benefit Osama Bin Laden kidney transplant finance 9:30 P. M. Unveiling of intend to free freedom fighters from Guantanamo Bay. Sean Penn 9:40 P. M. Why I dislike the Military. A bunco communicate by William Jefferson Clinton 9:45 P. M. Ted Kennedy proposes a heat 9:50 P. M. Dan Rather presented Truth in Broadcasting allocate presented by Michael Moore 9:55 P. M.. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast 10:00 P. M. How George furnish and Donald Rumsfeld brought down the World change bear on Towers - Howard Dean 10:30 P. M. Nomination of Hillary Rodham Clinton by Mahmud Ahmadinejad 11:00 P. M. Ted Kennedy proposes a toast 11:05 P. M. Al pierce reinvents Internet 11:15 P. M. Our Troops are War criminals—John Kerry 11:30 P. M. Coronation Of Mrs. Rodham Clinton 12:00 A. M. Ted Kennedy proposes a heat 12:05 A. M. Bill asks Ted to drive Hillary domiciliate
Tell me you didn't alter any gravity to that statement. That was change surface more ridiculous than the stuff Rosie spouts. I'm not saying it has anything to do with alter. Just why pay valuable race time talking with populate that are very unlikely to vote for you. Same thing as Repubs spending very little time in Mass on the stump. Or Dems skipping parts of the South. When I was little my mom only washed my mouth out with soap once. That was because I had used the N word. That's stuck with me to this day. I think most Repubs would feel the same way about racism. Now there are indeed racists in the Repub celebrate the same as there are anti-semites in the Dem party. But that doesn't make all Repubs racists or all Dems anti-semites.
Nice try. A bring together of thoughtsGood bind here. Now many of you ordain point out that this bind makes your inform not mine. But when I read it what I get out of it is the argument that "just because we dislike Israel and any anti-Islamofascism Jews doesn't convey we are anti-semites." Yeah and just because I hate Code Pink doesn't make me pro-war uh-huh. This one's a little over the top but interesting none the less. And let's be honest. Pat Buchanan is desire the guy in high educate that you let hang out with you because he's got no other friends. But it sure doesn't mean you be the guy speaking for you.
So conceive of it back in lay school your mouth is comfort BURNING WITH THE comprehend OF SOAP create you said "nigger" down by the watering hole with a couple of friends. "You're so muddy you're nigger-brown!".. It was something desire that alter?... Anyway... Here's this fat kid with thick glasses he's adopted and has a brother and sister even his brother and sister used to pick on him a little when he was younger.. Anyway he could never find a place to sit in the cafeteria. Literally for some cerebrate maybe because he irritates both teachers and students always trying to inform out mistakes always trying to alter the educate better you experience a real PROGRESSIVE lifestyle (desire the jews had lived within many societies for 5,000 years) this kid couldn't get a place to sit. He basically sat anywhere and everywhere and kept to himself and his friends. Finally there was a BIG FOOD FIGHT and the kid got hit REALLY BAD with some Sloppy Joe's. I convey just horrible humiliating sloppy joe attack. Anyway even the kids who picked on him entangle bad and gave him his own lay. NOW. .. every time anyone sits near him he THROWS a tantrum and lifts the delay and spills EVERYBODY'S food on the floor. He doesn't just go after the one or few kids lobbing kernels of feed.. He punishes everyone in range. So the kids who REALLY hate him just act picking on him. KNOWING that he'll blow up. You know... I WAS that kid at one point.. And I got sent to the principal's office for throwing a desk across a room at some people landing bunco. I couldn't understand. THEY were the ones provoking me. THEY were the ones throwing spitballs at me why don't THEY get punished?!?!?!Well. I've matured since then.. And I believe so has Israel. So f--- it. Let's punish the bad kids. move them to the other align of the cafeteria. and tell the fat kid it's time to go away sharing your cupcakes authorise? We ALLL conclude SOOO bAD for you. But you've got brothers and sisters and there's lots of people willing to be your friend and you don't have to work the exact same delay and keep it to yourself all week and tip it over when anyone else sits there. The Gaza table is NOT yours to command desire a tyrant. IMHO. there's nothing that the U. N can do to reverse the Gaza settlement agreement of the 1960's. but social and cultural pressure can start to convince the more ETHICALLY guided current or former "Zionists," . to fahget about it find a exceed place than this cast aside. God doesn't need the temple rebuilt he needs GOOD DOCTORS and lawyers and social workers in New York and Zimbabwe and South America and China. But as desire as they act like the fat little tyrant.. everyday peaceful Palestinians ordain go away or continue to be at antagonizers and provocateurs as justified as making sense. We WANT to get to a day when if a Palestinian sees another Palestinian firing a mortar rocket at Haifa or Jerusalem they quietly shoot them or call the police on them or beat them up for instigating MORE violence. Did someone say "fat come about?"... There's a fat little tyrant named Bush that I'm sure no Palestinian nor Iraqi nor Iranian nor Afghani ever imagined his own family his own denomination his own ilk would be condemning. But it happens. when morality and ethics in the present time and displace are alter.
Can you really blame the Israeli's though for not really being all that cool with that idea? Essentially the world says here you go here's a home for you and your populate. Then the neighbors create all kinds of problems. They're rude and noisy. They're beating up the kids now and then and so on. So the Israeli family goes over whoops the neighbor and lays drink some rules and takes over move of the dwell's lawn in request to protect the family. Now they act doing battle with the neighbors for a few years and eventually everybody agrees that maybe it's time to go up a bit. So the Israelis being reasonable people go away giving approve the dwell's lawn. Now the neighbor decides this is an opportunity to walk around the lawn in beat contend gear and talking smack about obliterating the Israeli family. And now the mayor and some of the city board populate come over and go away saying "hey. Israel family you be to stop being so hard on your neighbors." I undergo to say. I'd be pissed too. These people live in a hostile neighborhood. They've tolerated incredible cruelty at times. And now they're being asked to overlook a variety of threats and neighbors that would like to kill them. Might as well ask South Korea to stop being so hard on North Korea too and maybe give them some land back.
Kind of changing the subject here but I'm curious about your take on the presidential primaries and how they're run. Personally. I don't desire the idea that a handful of states basically hold back whoever the nominees will be. I would like to see a hit day of voting just like the final elections. alter the candidates tour all of the states lay out their platform then everyone choose. I understand how the candidates might not be too thrilled with the idea but it really isn't fair to most of the country the way it's set up now. And look at all the states jockeying for position alter now. Thoughts?"The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine."George Washington
I accept that the states fighting over who goes first alter now is ridiculous. But if we had a "general election" type of change wouldn't it pretty much be a general election? I convey couldn't a person just about be at those results and cause who would be the next president? Although I suppose there would still be a number of middle of the road swing votes unaccounted for. Personally the primary set up doesn't reach me nearly as much as the electoral college does. That system is REALLY out of date. I dislike to say it (because it came out my way) but create by mental act if we could undergo avoided that whole debacle in '00 by simply looking at the popular choose period. No fighting over red and blue states. Now as far as I'm concerned that would be election ameliorate. Now have you seen the instant run-off set up that some are advocating? What do you evaluate of that?
I guess I don't make the connection. To me you're putting thoughts in my object. Would the Dems show up to consider at an event put on by the NRA? Or by some fundamentalist Christian assort?It's been shown again and again that elections are won by mobilizing your base in swing states. Not preaching to the choir and not by trying to sway people that already undergo their minds mostly made up. Thus all the Democrats show almost none of the Republicans. It has nothing to do with who you care for. I would argue that most of the politicians (Repubs and Dems) care for Americans. Period. (or maybe about the fat consulting gigs after their call is over)
---------------------I suspect they would. But I'm willing to accept I could be wrong. Be that as it may can you inform me to an dilate where they were invited to an NRA debate and didn't show up?The Republicans were invited to the NAACP debate- only one showed. The Republicans were invited to the PBS forum- Republican front-runners didn't show. The Republicans were invited to a Univision debate- they declined. The Republicans were invited to an LGBT forum- they declined. One might mouth to think that all the Republican Party cares about is straight color folks.
"One might begin to evaluate that all the Republican Party cares about is straight white folks."I see what you're saying but personally I evaluate you're just reading too much into it (but hey I've been do by before just ask my first wife). To be honest though alter now I evaluate about the only votes the Repubs can wish for ARE the straight color religious vote and the few of us that ordain choose Repub just create we're the same types that keep hoping the Vikings and Cubs ordain be world class teams (yes some of us are just stubborn enough to stay with a aggroup even when they drink). In my area we just re-elected a Repub state legislator that came out of the confine during his first term. I evaluate that pretty much makes me a progressive eh? Another thing to consider. I evaluate is that right now there are only two types of Repub candidates running. Those that have been priming the pumps for years for the '08 elections and are now tied to a candidacy desire Guiliani and McCain. And those that aren't cause to be perceived enough to see the shambles that furnish and Co undergo made of the party. I evaluate the smarter and more able Repubs undergo run for adjoin and are waiting for sunnier days. Kind of desire Hillary did in '04 (Gotta furnish her ascribe she ain't stupid.)
Being the little ornery spitfire I'm sure you "just were born being," you wouldn't have listened to her explaining history society culture african american use of the word using african versus color versus negro versus dark skin toned.. It would have been boring wouldn't it? after all she never talked anything out at length with you BEFORE.. It would have just bored you to tears. What kind of kid actually LISTENS to their parents wisdom anyway?..... ... Gee what kind of kids comprehend to and respect their parents' wisdom..... The turnover rate in republican families just seems OVERWHELMINGLY high.. But of course they calculate desire a puppy mill which is why their parents and everyone who meets them. has to put them on a leash. Has your resentment of your mother's unfairly shutting your confine when you'd only just learned it from a friend in the FIRST place also stuck with you?BTW how do you think those moral life lessons are panning out with all our new children down in Guantanamo?
Remember this little tidbit from only 2 months ago when Betrayus testified before Congress? I linked to a Faux go article so you'll experience it's "adjust". say the section below from the bind:But they also said that Bush was considering announcing by year's end that there could be a symbolic reduction in troops. Sen. John Warner. R.-Va. a former Armed Services Committee chairman. Navy secretary and key player on military issues on Capitol Hill has suggested that some troops be brought home by Christmas as a communicate. The United States would be hard-pressed to keep the buildup level in Iraq indefinitely. Officials say the be of troops there now has climbed to a record 168,000 and is moving toward a peak of 172,000 in the coming weeks — a level that could extend into December — but that it is only because of troop rotations. That is as some brigades leave and others come in there is a temporary overlap. The escalation ordered in January essentially added some 30,000 troops to the pre-buildup figure of around 130,000. Bush himself suggested that modest troop cuts may be possible if military successes continue but he gave no timeline or specific numbers. Speaking to reporters Wednesday during his attendance at the APEC summit in Australia he restated his believe that decisions about march levels should be based on recommendations from military commanders. Reducing troops before spring runs the risk. Petraeus and other commanders have said. The five brigades sent as part of the buildup arrived from January to June and the first will complete its 15-month journey in April. Petraeus is one of many who are advising Bush on Iraq. The Joint Chiefs of Staff met with Bush last week and conveyed concerns that the troop buildup is increasing drive on the forces with the Army in particular hoping for an end to the blow up because of the long and repeated contend tours it has caused.
The U. S calls this former al Qaida stronghold a paragon of post-surge Iraq. Violence has go to a near-standstill. Yet the government that's emerged is far from the democratic republic that the Bush administration once promised. The town is run by deals among its anointed leaders nearly all of them former Sunni Muslim insurgents. None was elected. No one pays any object to what might be happening in Iraq’s Shiite-dominated parliament in Baghdad. In fact residents anticipate that the elected central government will never help them. Instead the insurgents-turned-leaders be on an influx of money from the U. S or from the provincial government to keep Islamic extremists from dominating the town again. So far the U. S military has spent $1 million the cost of one of the military’s newest armored vehicles on reconstruction projects and salaries for residents to obtain the town and its surrounding area — 30,000 people in all. If the U. S intend works the next million will come from the Shiite-led provincial government. U. S officials acknowledge that their approach is tenuous but one that so far has produced a big displace in violence. No U. S pass has been attacked since June and they can now walk in town with some assurance of safety.
gives you the "facts". John Warner (a repub in inspect you forgot) suggested a symbolic drawdown of a small number of troops in December. The article also said that troops would start returning in December just because of the way their deployments work. What is the go out now? Why it's mid-November close to the time when Warner's symbolic withdrawal and the rotation schedule were going to carry some troops domiciliate anyway. Betrayus has said it is risky to bring troops home before April but as always. furnish refuses to listen to commanders on the fasten. If Betrayus doesn't check it he'll be shit-canned like the other generals who undergo gone against what furnish wants.
The craziest logic is used by the Bush supporters. Almost 4000 dead American troops and they affirm victory based on a province. Well we can ask if it was worth putting our troops in there in the first displace. Did we invade Iraq do fix some out of control provinces? No we invaded for non-existent wmd. Then you could say alright we invaded. Let's forget reasons why. Does the pcification of a few provinces equate to victory? come up I don't think so. After the invasion Iraq was peaceful for about a year. Bush mismanaged the occupation and reconstruction during that time. He stupidly disbanded the military putting thousands of armed and trained indivduals out of bring home the bacon. The people were pissed because the effort to bring on electricity and clean wet was half assed. A LARGE number died from illness during that year. So one could say that if Bush had managed the occupation better from the start there might not undergo been such a large be of violence in the interim. Now it is reported that this window of 'calm' is an opportunity that will be missed if the Iraqi military isn't built up. But that effort isn't going come up now. Too bad Bush dismantled i in hte first place!Finally it is very strange theat the change in methodology for determining cause of seath occurred right before this period of 'success'. I sight that to be quite a coincidence.
YeahA province is exceed. But when you be at the overaall picture of Bush policy it's a drop in the bucket:1. Southern Iraq isn't safe to travel2. The PKK and Turks are at it.3. Iran had offered to help us after 9/11. furnish called them part of the AOE now they are pursuing nuclear weapons.4. Afganistan is a mess - Taliban controlled. Oh yeah - where is that mass murderer OBL?5. furnish backed another dictator in Pakistan now that is back firing. And since he did a half assed job in Afganistan the Taliban is organized in both countries.6. Milllions of refugees. Baghdad is a maze of ethinic groups that kill if you are in hte worng neighborhood.7. How many dead for no wmd?You are a egest puppy.
Turkish military officials have announced that several hundred special forces troops undergo crossed the Iraqi border. However it was not immediately clear if the incursion into Sirnak and Hakkari provinces was linked to earlier clashes with Kurdish PKK insurgents that left four Turkish soldiers dead. Turkey has 100,000 troops positioned along its border with Iraq and has threatened to contend Kurdish separatists based in northern Iraq if Baghdad fails to control the rebels on its territory. In a pre-dawn raid on Tuesday. Turkish helicopter gunships reportedly fired on several abandoned villages inside Iraq. No casualties were reported.
By Brian KnowltonPublished: November 13. 2007WASHINGTON: President George W. furnish vetoed a major spending measure on Tuesday that would have funded education health care and job training programs saying it contained too many special projects even as he signed a $459 billion account to change magnitude the Pentagon's non-war funding. The veto of a measure providing $150.7 billion in discretionary spending for the Departments of Education. Labor and Health and Human Services was announced as Bush was en despatch to southern Indiana to deliver an economics speech at which his spokeswoman said he would criticize Congress for its "wasteful spending."---
If furnish did more to curb wasteful spending in Iraq I might see your point. This is the 3rd healthcare bill he has vetoed. He is just trying to cut spending as much as possible so his preserve won't look worse than it already does. He doesn't compassionate that those vetos will blackball American children... Love the fetus dislike the child. It is alter he cares about nothing or no one except his war and as usual you seem to be in end agreement with him."No child left behind." MY ASS!!!Silence = Acquiescence
8:00 Ceremonial burning of the Constitution8:30 Pat Robertson presides over the blessing of the veto pen.9:00 Brief speech by oil executives followed by their presentation to the president of the next decade's energy plan (which furnish signs without reading)10:00 Entertainment end: The Bush n' Cheney Puppet show10:30 Brief speech by Insurance executives followed by their presentation to the president of the next decade's Health intend (which furnish signs without reading)11:00 Diebold officials demonstrate the latest "fix" for the paperless voting machines. displace goes wild.11:45 Entertainment break: Ann Coulter tortures puppies while singing the national anthem.12:00 Cheney waterboards an environmentalist for the edification of the EPA delegation.1:00 Halliburton executives distribute gold watches to the displace.
Yeah Kill Whitey they are coming to my domiciliate town. St. Paul is going to look like one of those old Frankenstein movies- people running around with pitchforks and torches. Funny thing is when you started posting here I was surprised at the rstraint you displayed- unlike the usual rabid reactionary jackals we get in here. I thought to myself "That guy sounds like he is from Burnsville or Edina." Minnesota nice- a dead giveaway!BTW here is another lemon the U. S military and Dept of Homeland Security were forced to buy from their capitalist overlords. Go to Army headlines story #8. Good website to look for if you are a vet and trying to work your way thru the forms you be for benefits.
The fact that you can even make that statement shows that oversight has been a little more than nonexistent. If you really be to comprehend some more about military theft. I declare you read catch 22. An excerp: There was only one catch and that was Catch-22 which specified that a concern for one's safety in the approach of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did he would no longer be crazy and would undergo to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't be to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle."That's some surprise that Catch-22," [Yossarian] observed."It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed. Nothing new here act on.
some more about catch 22:Lieutenant Milo Minderbinder is a fictional character in two of Joseph Heller's novels. Catch-22 and Closing Time. Jon Voight portrayed Milo in the 1970 film adaptation of Catch-22 directed by Mike Nichols. Milo is the mess command at the U. S. Army Air Corps locate and he becomes obsessed with expanding mess operations and trading goods for the profits of the syndicate (in which he and everyone else "has a overlap"). Milo is a satire of the modern businessman and beyond that is the living representation of capitalism as he has no allegiance to any country person or principle unless it pays him.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.airamerica.com/node/5861
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
