Hospitallers

search for more blogs here

 

"Các tr?n ?ánh c?a Napoleon t? n?m 1793-1805" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-11-29 14:13:59

Chào mừng đã đến vá»›i forum oOo VnSharing Group oOo. Bạn chưa đăng kí (hoặc chưa đăng nhập) nên quyá»n lợi cá»§a bạn sẽ bị hạn chế. Việc đăng kí làm thành viên hoàn toàn miá»…n phí sau khi đăng kí bạn có thể post bài tham gia thảo luận liên lạc vá»›i các thành viên khác qua hệ thống tin nhắn riêng yêu cầu manga/anime.. và rất nhiá»u quyá»n lợi khác. Thá»§ tục đăng kí rất nhanh chóng và đơn giản hãy !Nếu bạn quên mật khẩu xin nhấn vào Nếu bạn gặp trục trặc trong vấn đỠđăng kí hoặc không thể đăng nhập hãy Trích từ wikipedia.1. Trận Toulon (1793) Äây là trận đánh đầu tiên đánh dấu sá»± bắt đầu cá»§a má»™t tài năng quân sá»± sẽ làm rung chuyển châu Âu trong suốt gần 2 thập ká»· tiếp theo. Lúc này sau cách mạng Tư Sản 1789. ở Marseille có cuá»™c nổi dậy cá»§a những ngưá»i á»§ng há»™ hoàng gia được sá»± hậu thuẫn cá»§a ngưá»i Anh. Sau khi tướng Carteaux giải phóng Marseille vào ngày 25-8 phe bảo hoàng đã kịp giao Toulon cho quân Anh. Hạm đội hải quân hoàng gia đã thả neo. đổ bá»™ má»™t bá»™ phân quân lính tăng cưá»ng cho lá»±c lượng vốn đã rất đáng gá»m ở đây. Cảng Toulon lúc đó chiếm má»™t vị trí quan trá»ng trấn giữ vùng Äịa Trung Hải và 1/3 số chiến thuyá»n cá»§a Pháp đóng tại đây. Äô đốc Samuel Hood và tướng O'Hara phía quân Anh đã cá»§ng cố lại các pháo đài trang bị vá»›i các khẩu thần công lá»›n yểm trợ nhằm ngăn cản ná»— lá»±c chiếm lại cảng cá»§a quân cá»™ng hòa. Phía Pháp tướng Carteaux vốn bất tài ngay khi Napoleong lúc đó Ä‘ang là đại úy thăm các ụ pháo do ông này bố trí xây dá»±ng đã thấy ngay tầm bắn cá»§a đạn pháo không thể vá»›i tá»›i các chiến thuyá»n Pháp. Trước đó Napoleong đã gá»­i vá» bá»™ trưởng chiến tranh ở Paris đỠxuất má»™t mô hình lò có khả năng nung đỠđạn đại bác đến mức có thể làm cháy thuyá»n địch. Mặc dù bị Carteaux gây cản trở nhưng Bonaparte vẫn được tín nhiệm thăng cấp thiếu tá chỉ huy pháo binh. Quân Anh chá»§ động tấn công vào các ụ pháo cá»§a quân Pháp nhưng tổn thất nặng ná». Napoléong truy quét và bắt được tướng O'Hara. Pháo Binh Pháp bắt đầu tấn công vào hai pháo đài Éguillette và Balaguir vốn ở vị trí then chốt có thể há»· diệt má»i tàu bè tiến vào cảng. Quân Anh cÅ©ng trả đũa bằng phản pháo. Vào giữa đêm 16/12 Bonaparte dẫn đầu má»™t tiểu Ä‘oàn bá»™ binh tấn công vào đánh vào Ä‘iểm cao Caire và chiếm pháo đài nhá» Gibraltar. Sau đó chính những thần công cá»§a Anh được quay nòng vá» chính phía há». Bonaparte mặc dù bị thương ở đùi vẫn thừa thắng dẫn bá»™ binh đánh thẳng vào hai pháo đài Éguillette và Balaguir. Quân Anh hoảng loạn bá» chạy để lại toàn bá»™ số thần công còn chưa dùng đến. Ngay lập tức các hạm đội Anh trong cảng bị pháo binh tấn công. Ngày hôm sau cÅ©ng vá»›i chiến thuật như vậy Napoléon chiếm tiếp pháo đài Malbosquet các chiến thuyá»n Anh phải bá» chạy trước khi đốt cháy các chiến thuyá»n Pháp. Napoléon được thăng lên cấp tướng chỉ huy lữ Ä‘oàn. Khi đó ông má»›i 24 tuổi. 2. Chiến dịch ITALY (1796-1797) Äây là chiến dịch đầu tiên trong Ä‘á»i cá»§a Napoleon. Nó bắt đầu vào ngày 11/3/1796 khi ông nhận lệnh từ viện Äốc chính tức 3 ngày sau khi ông kết hôn vá»›i Josephine. Nhưng ngay khi đặt chân đến đơn vị cá»§a mìn rắc rối đầu tiên đã xảy ra. ÄÆ¡n vị do ông chỉ huy rÆ¡i vào tình trạng đến ná»—i không khác gì má»™t đám đói rách. Nạn tham nhÅ©ng hoành hành khắp nÆ¡i. Binh lính đói rách nghèo khổ thậm chí cả má»™t tiểu Ä‘oàn không có giày. Nạn bóc lá»™t. ăn hối. ăn cắp vặt..... diá»…n ra từng ngày. Các tướng lÄ©nh lại không ưa Napoleon vì há» thấy phải phục tùng má»™t thắng nhóc 27 tuổi là sá»± sỉ nhục. Tuy gặp nhiá»u khó khăn nhưng Napoleon vẫn rất bình tÄ©nh. Ông đến từng đơn vị động viên binh lính và cố gắng phát lương cho há». Ông thay những khẩu pháo cÅ© kÄ© bằng những khẩu pháo má»›i và mạnh hÆ¡n.Ông dùng nhiá»u cách để kích động lấy tinh thần binh sÄ© và xá»­ bắn những kẻ nổi loạn. Vì vậy chỉ trong má»™t thá»i gian ngắn quân đội cá»§a ông đã đâu vào đấy. Ngày 9/4/1796. Napoleon quyết định vượt núi Aples cùng vá»›i quân đội cuả mình. Chiến dịch thật sá»± bắt đầu. Äây là má»™t cuá»™c hành quân gian khổ. Tuy vậy quân đội Pháp đã vượt qua trong 6 ngày. Ngay sau đó hỠđã có má»™t trận đấu vá»›i quân Ão và quân Piemont và sau đó quân Pháp đã chiếm được vùng đất phì nhiêu này. Không dừng ở đó. Napoleon thúc quân Ä‘i đánh chiếm Milan Ä‘ang nằm trong tay quân Ão. Vá»›i sá»± nghi binh tài tình. Napoleon đã dẫn binh lính vượt qua sông Po thành công và tiến sát vào Milan hÆ¡n. Sau thất bại này quân Ão rút qua sông Ada cố thá»§ ngăn không cho quân Pháp tiến lên. Ngày 10/5/1769 quân Pháp và Ão đánh nhau đẫm máu ở cầu Lodi bắc qua sông Ada. Trước khi trận đánh nổ ra. Napoleon đã đích thân Ä‘i trinh sát trận địa và đã tá»± tay bố trí trận địa pháo binh. Ông căn Ä‘o thật kÄ© và chính xác vì ông biết chỉ có hoả lá»±c pháo binh má»›i hạ được quân Ão. Äúng như ông dá»± kiến hoả lá»±c mạnh mẽ cá»§a pháo binh Pháp đã làm tê liệt quân Ão. Lúc cuá»™c chiến đấu diá»…n ra ác liệt ở đầu cầu thì Napoleon dẫn đầu má»™t tiểu Ä‘oàn cận vệ xông tá»›i dưới làn mưa đạn. 20 khẩu pháo cá»§a quân áo nhả đạn quét sạch cầu và lân cận. Lính cận vệ do Napoleon dẫn đầu. đã chiếm được cầu và đánh bật được quân áo ra xa; quân áo bá» lại trên chiến trưá»ng 15 khẩu pháo và chừng 2.000 ngưá»i vừa bị chết và bị thương. Sau má»™t ngày đánh nhau đẫm máu. Quân Ão vỡ trận bá» chạy. Napoleon tung quân truy kích và chiếm Milan ngày 15/5/1796. Vùng Lombardie rÆ¡i vào tay quân Pháp. Nhưng sau chiến thắng này phá»§ Äốc chính lại thấy Napoleon quá tunh hoành không nghe há» nữa nên hỠđã muốn khống chế bá»›t binh quyá»n cá»§a Napoleon nên đã ra lệnh tách làm đôi quân Ä‘oàn Italy giao cho má»™t viên tướng khác. Napoleon đã nổi giận lôi đình và dá»a sẽ từ chức nếu chia đôi quân Ä‘oàn cá»§a ông. Nghe vậy các quan Äốc chính sợ toát mồ hôi lạnh và không giám đả động gì tá»›i Napoleon nữa. Há» biết rằng cÆ¡ đồ cá»§a há» Ä‘á»u do Napoleon mà có. Nay Napoleon mà từ chức thì má»i thứ Ä‘á»u sụp đổ. Còn vá» nước Ão sau thảm bại ở Milan. đã quyết định phục thù. Há» liá»n thay đổi tướng viên tướng già bằng má»™t viên tướng trẻ má»›i và tăng cưá»ng thêm há»a lá»±c bổ sung thêm quân vá»›i ý định phục thù. Äể đối đầu vá»›i quân Ão mạnh hÆ¡n hẳn. Napoleon đã quyết định dùng kế để thắng. Ông ra lệnh cho binh sÄ© rút khá»i thành Mantova. để lại má»™t lượng lá»›n pháo và vÅ© khí. Khi tiến vào,quân Ão thâý thành trống trÆ¡n tưởng đối phương đã rút lui liá»n mừng ra mặt. Và hỠđã phạm sai lầm khi chia quân ra truy kích. Chỉ chá» thá»i cÆ¡ này. Napoleon liá»n phản công bằng cách diệt từng cánh quân đối phương. Vì vậy chỉ mất 6 ngày quân Pháp đã diệt gá»n 20 ngàn lính Ão. Quân Pháp thừa thắng tiến lên tấn công tàn quân Ão đã chạy vá» thành Mantova. Sau khi bao vây suốt năm tháng trá»i triá»u đình Ão cá»­ ngay 40 ngàn quân đến giải vây. Ngaỳ 15/11/1796 tại cầu Arcole đã diá»…n ra trận đánh đẫm máu kéo dài đến ngày 17/11/1796. Quân Ão đại bại phải đầu hàng vô Ä‘iá»u kiện. Napoleon đã vượt qua những thá»­ thách máu lá»­a đấu tiên ở nước Italy khi má»›i 27 tuổi. Sang năm 1797. được sá»­ phê chuẩn cá»§a phá»§ đốc chính. Napoleon dẫ quân tiến vào nước Ão. Cả triá»u đình Ão hoảng sợ rối loạn và phải cầu hòa. Tháng 7/1797 hai nước Pháp-Ão kí hiệp ước đình chiến chiến tranh kết thúc.3. Viá»…n chinh xâm lăng Ai Cập (1798-1799) Vào tháng 5 năm 1798. Napoléon bắt đầu cuá»™c viá»…n chinh tại Ai Cập vá»›i 38,000 quân. Các chiến thắng bắt đầu: pháo đài Malta cá»§a các hiệp sÄ© Hospitallers (the Knights Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem) bị thất thá»§ vào ngày 10-6-1798 rồi thành phố Alexandria cá»§a Ai Cập đầu hàng vào ngày 1 tháng 7. Napoléon đã đánh bại các kẻ cai trị xứ Ai Cập có tên là nhóm Mamelukes trong trận đánh tại các Kim Tá»± Tháp gần thành phố Cairo. Quân Mamelukes đã chạy trốn vá» phía nam bá» lại má»™t phần pháo binh (40 khẩu pháo). Mấy nghìn xác chết phá»§ kín chiến trưá»ng. Rồi đồng bằng sông Nile bị chinh phục rất nhanh chóng. Nhưng vào ngày 1-8-1798 hạm đội Pháp bá» neo tại Vịnh Abu Qir đã bị hoàn toàn phá há»§y bởi hạm đội Anh cá»§a Äô Äốc Horatio Nelson trong trận thá»§y chiến “Dòng Sông Nile†(the Battle of the Nile) khiến cho Ä‘oàn quân Pháp bị mắc kẹt trong miá»n đất mà hỠđã chinh phục được và bị cắt đứt các nguồn tăng cưá»ng và tiếp tế. CÅ©ng vào thá»i gian này. Napoléon đã cố gắng đưa vào xứ Ai Cập các định chế chính trị cách quản trị và tài năng kỹ thuật cá»§a tây phương. Quốc gia bảo há»™ Ai Cập là Thổ NhÄ© Kỳ bèn liên minh vá»›i các nước Anh nước Nga và tuyên chiến vá»›i nước Pháp vào tháng 9 năm đó. Äể ngăn chặn cuá»™c tấn công cá»§a Thổ NhÄ© Kỳ vào xứ Ai Cập và có lẽ cÅ©ng vì muốn trở vỠđất Pháp bằng con đưá»ng Anatolia. Napoléon đã đưa quân qua Syria vào tháng 2 năm 1799 tiến tá»›i pháo đài Acre (ngày nay là Akko thuá»™c nước Do Thái) và Ä‘oàn quân Pháp đã bị chặn đánh thảm bại tại nÆ¡i này. Sau nhiá»u đợt xung phong vô hiệu ngày 20 tháng 5 năm 1799 quân Pháp phải bá» cuá»™c bao vây tổng cá»™ng quân Pháp đã mất 3.000 ngưá»i. Bên bị bao vây còn thiệt hại lá»›n hÆ¡n thế nữa. Napoléon đành phải rút vá» Ai Cập và khi tá»›i Abu Qir gần Vịnh Abu Qir. ông đã đột kích và tiêu diệt gần 15.000 quân Thổ vào ngày 25 tháng 7 năm 1799. Vào tháng 8 năm 1799,Có nhiá»u âm mưu phản cách mạng. Chế độ Cá»™ng Hòa Ä‘ang cần cấp cứu. Há»™i Äồng Chấp Chính đã ra lệnh cho Napoléon trở vá» . Tháng 8 năm 1799. Napoléon Bonaparte lên tầu lẻn vá» Pháp giao quyá»n chỉ huy Ä‘oàn quân Ai Cập cho Tướng Jean Kleber. 4. Trận Marengo (1800) Äây là trận đánh quan trá»ng đầu tiên cá»§a Napoleon trong cương vị Tổng tài cá»§a nước Pháp. Trận đánh khởi đầu vào buổi sá»›m ngày 14 tháng 6 năm 1800 ở gần Marengo. Napoleon có cả thảy 20.000 quân và chỉ Ä‘iá»u động bá»™ phận pháo loại tồi nhất cùng vượt đèo Grăng Xanh Béc-na vá»›i ông hồi tháng 5 còn pháo binh chá»§ lá»±c đã hành quân đến chậm vì bị mắc vây và đánh chiếm má»™t cứ Ä‘iểm mạnh trong núi che chở cho quân áo. Trong khi tướng Ão Melas chỉ huy má»™t đạo quân 30.000 ngưá»i và 100 cá»— pháo có đầy đủ đạn dược thì Napoleon lại còn phải giao cho tướng De Saix má»™t phần trong số pháo tồi cá»§a mình. Thế là Napoleon chỉ có 15 khẩu pháo để chống vá»›i 100 khẩu cá»§a quân áo. Quân Pháp vừa đánh vừa lùi và giáng cho quân địch những đòn đích đáng nhưng bản thân cÅ©ng bị thiệt hại nặng. Äến hai giá» chiá»u trận đánh xem chừng thất bại không thể cứu vãn được. Quá ba giá». Melas ca khúc khải hoàn cá»­ ngưá»i vá» Viên báo tin quân áo toàn thắng thu nhiá»u chiến lợi phẩm và tù binh tướng vô địch Napoleon đã thất bại. Tình trạng há»—n độn đã bao trùm lên tổng hành dinh quân đội Pháp. Napoleon giữ thái độ bình tÄ©nh vừa nhắc nhở cần phải cầm cá»± vì trận đánh chưa kết thúc. Và đến ba giá» chiá»u tình thế đột nhiên thay đổi má»™t cách bất ngá» bởi sư Ä‘oàn De Saix được phái xuống phía nam để cắt đưá»ng rút lui cá»§a quân địch Ä‘ang từ Giên trở vá» cấp tốc hành quân quay trở lại. đã công kích ồ ạt vào quân áo đúng giá» phút quyết định chiến trưá»ng. Quân áo hết sức tin tưởng vào sá»± toàn thắng cá»§a hỠđến ná»—i lúc ấy có nhiá»u đơn vị quân đội áo cho toàn thể đơn vị bố trí chuẩn bị nghỉ ngÆ¡i và ăn chiá»u. Bị sư Ä‘oàn tinh nhuệ cá»§a De Saix ập đánh và tiếp đó là tất cả các đơn vị cá»§a Napoleon cÅ©ng đánh vào quân đội áo hoàn toàn bị đánh bại. Năm giá» chiá»u quân áo bá» chạy bị kỵ binh Pháp truy kích. Tướng De Saix hy sinh ngay từ phút đầu cá»§a trận đánh,Napoleon đã bật khóc khi biết tin đó. Nước Ão bị bắt buá»™c phải ký Hòa Ước Luneville vào tháng 2 năm 1801 công nhận nước Pháp có quyá»n chiếm đóng các miá»n sông Rhine dãy núi Alps và dãy núi Pyrenées. 5. Trận Ulm (1805) Äây là chiến địch đầu tiên cá»§a Napoleon trong vai trò hoàng đế Pháp. Sau khi biết tin chính xác quân Nga tiến sang nước Ão. Napoléon bỠý định tiến sang nước Anh và hướng các lá»±c lượng chính cá»§a mình ra chống lại cuá»™c liên minh quân sá»± lần thứ 3 (Nga - Ão). Kế hoạch cá»§a Napoléon là tiến hành phòng thá»§ ở Italia và tập trung lá»±c lượng chá»§ yếu dưới sá»± chỉ huy trá»±c tiếp cá»§a mình trên mặt trận Nadube. Vá» mặt chiến dịch chiến thuật. Napoléon chá»§ trương tìm cách không cho liên minh sát nhập lại vá»›i nhau và dá»± định dùng cách đánh tỉa để buá»™c đối phương rá»i ra từng mảnh. Thá»±c hiện kế hoạch trên theo lệnh Napoléon từ trại Boulogne (Tây Bắc Pháp). đại quân Pháp gồm 7 quân Ä‘oàn (186000 ngưá»i) chia làm nhiá»u ngả hành quân cấp tốc tiến vá» sông Danube có vị trí Ulm (Nam nước Äức) kiên cố án ngữ sưá»n bên trái. Chưa đầy 3 tuần lá»… má»™t Ä‘oàn quân to lá»›n đối vá»›i thá»i bấy giỠđã di chuyển từ biển Manche đến sông Danube (hÆ¡n 1200 km) mà hầu như không có bệnh binh và ngưá»i Ä‘i rá»›t lại phía sau. Äây là Ä‘iá»u bất ngỠđối vá»›i khối liên minh quân sá»± lần thứ ba (Nga - Ão). Nhá» có kế hoạch hành quân cấp tốc tất cả đã đến nÆ¡i tập trung xung quanh thành Ulm và dồn tướng Ão là Mack cùng phần lá»›n quân Ão như bị nhốt trong má»™t cái túi. Quân Ä‘oàn cá»§a Sout và Lannes cÅ©ng như kỵ binh cá»§a Murat đã vượt sông Danube và bất ngá» xuất kích vào sau lưng quân cá»§a Mack. Thấy tình hình nguy khốn má»™t bá»™ phận quân Ão chạy thoát vá» phía Äông nhưng dại bá»™ phận bị vây dồn vào Ulm. Xung quanh Mack vòng vây ngày càng thịt chặt. Mark muốn phá vây chạy trốn nhưng bị má»™t tên gján Ä‘iệp cá»§a Napoléon là Sunmaixte đánh lừa. Tên này quả quyết xin Mark cố thá»§ và chẳng bao lâu nữa Napoléon sẽ phải bá» vây vì ở Paris Ä‘ang có biến nổ ra má»™t cuá»™c chống lại ông ta và thế là attach đã trúng kế. Ngày 15/10/1805. Nây và Lannes chiếm các cao Ä‘iểm xung quanh Ulm. Tình thế cá»§a Mack trở nên tuyệt vá»ng. Napoléon cho ngưá»i đến thương lượng đòi Mark phải đầu hàng và dá»a nếu buá»™c phải đánh vào thì sẽ tiêu diệt hết. Ngày 20/10/1808. Mack đầu hàng. Napoléon thả cho Mark vá» còn tù binh thì đưa sang Pháp. Không nán lâu ở Ulm. Napoléon tiến thẳng đến Viên theo hữu ngạn sông Danube. Trong lúc truy kích quân Pháp còn bắt thêm được rất nhieu tù binh. Số tổn thất cá»§a quân Ão lúc này đã lên tá»›i 61000 ngưá»i (32000 ngưá»i ở Ulm. 29000 ngưá»i bị bắt trước khi thành Ulm thất thá»§) chưa kể số bị thương bị chết mất tích và má»™t số bị bắt trong quá trình truy kích.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://vnsharing.net/forum/showthread.php?t=9098

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Các tr?n ?ánh c?a Napoleon t? n?m 1793-1805" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-11-29 14:13:55

Chào mừng đã đến vá»›i forum oOo VnSharing Group oOo. Bạn chưa đăng kí (hoặc chưa đăng nhập) nên quyá»n lợi cá»§a bạn sẽ bị hạn chế. Việc đăng kí làm thành viên hoàn toàn miá»…n phí sau khi đăng kí bạn có thể affix bài tham gia thảo luận liên lạc vá»›i các thành viên khác qua hệ thống tin nhắn riêng yêu cầu manga/anime.. và rất nhiá»u quyá»n lợi khác. Thá»§ tục đăng kí rất nhanh chóng và đơn giản hãy !Nếu bạn quên mật khẩu xin nhấn vào Nếu bạn gặp trục trặc trong vấn đỠđăng kí hoặc không thể đăng nhập hãy Trích từ wikipedia.1. Trận Toulon (1793) Äây là trận đánh đầu tiên đánh dấu sá»± bắt đầu cá»§a má»™t tài năng quân sá»± sẽ làm rung chuyển châu Âu trong suốt gần 2 thập ká»· tiếp theo. Lúc này sau cách mạng Tư Sản 1789. ở Marseille có cuá»™c nổi dậy cá»§a những ngưá»i á»§ng há»™ hoàng gia được sá»± hậu thuẫn cá»§a ngưá»i Anh. Sau khi tướng Carteaux giải phóng Marseille vào ngày 25-8 phe bảo hoàng đã kịp giao Toulon cho quân Anh. Hạm đội hải quân hoàng gia đã thả neo. đổ bá»™ má»™t bá»™ phân quân lính tăng cưá»ng cho lá»±c lượng vốn đã rất đáng gá»m ở đây. Cảng Toulon lúc đó chiếm má»™t vị trí quan trá»ng trấn giữ vùng Äịa Trung Hải và 1/3 số chiến thuyá»n cá»§a Pháp đóng tại đây. Äô đốc Samuel Hood và tướng O'Hara phía quân Anh đã cá»§ng cố lại các pháo đài trang bị vá»›i các khẩu thần công lá»›n yểm trợ nhằm ngăn cản ná»— lá»±c chiếm lại cảng cá»§a quân cá»™ng hòa. Phía Pháp tướng Carteaux vốn bất tài ngay khi Napoleong lúc đó Ä‘ang là đại úy thăm các ụ pháo do ông này bố trí xây dá»±ng đã thấy ngay tầm bắn cá»§a đạn pháo không thể vá»›i tá»›i các chiến thuyá»n Pháp. Trước đó Napoleong đã gá»­i vá» bá»™ trưởng chiến tranh ở Paris đỠxuất má»™t mô hình lò có khả năng nung đỠđạn đại bác đến mức có thể làm cháy thuyá»n địch. Mặc dù bị Carteaux gây cản trở nhưng Bonaparte vẫn được tín nhiệm thăng cấp thiếu tá chỉ huy pháo binh. Quân Anh chá»§ động tấn công vào các ụ pháo cá»§a quân Pháp nhưng tổn thất nặng ná». Napoléong truy quét và bắt được tướng O'Hara. Pháo Binh Pháp bắt đầu tấn công vào hai pháo đài Éguillette và Balaguir vốn ở vị trí then chốt có thể há»· diệt má»i tàu bè tiến vào cảng. Quân Anh cÅ©ng trả đũa bằng phản pháo. Vào giữa đêm 16/12 Bonaparte dẫn đầu má»™t tiểu Ä‘oàn bá»™ binh tấn công vào đánh vào Ä‘iểm cao Caire và chiếm pháo đài nhá» Gibraltar. Sau đó chính những thần công cá»§a Anh được quay nòng vá» chính phía há». Bonaparte mặc dù bị thương ở đùi vẫn thừa thắng dẫn bá»™ binh đánh thẳng vào hai pháo đài Éguillette và Balaguir. Quân Anh hoảng loạn bá» chạy để lại toàn bá»™ số thần công còn chưa dùng đến. Ngay lập tức các hạm đội Anh trong cảng bị pháo binh tấn công. Ngày hôm sau cÅ©ng vá»›i chiến thuật như vậy Napoléon chiếm tiếp pháo đài Malbosquet các chiến thuyá»n Anh phải bá» chạy trước khi đốt cháy các chiến thuyá»n Pháp. Napoléon được thăng lên cấp tướng chỉ huy lữ Ä‘oàn. Khi đó ông má»›i 24 tuổi. 2. Chiến dịch ITALY (1796-1797) Äây là chiến dịch đầu tiên trong Ä‘á»i cá»§a Napoleon. Nó bắt đầu vào ngày 11/3/1796 khi ông nhận lệnh từ viện Äốc chính tức 3 ngày sau khi ông kết hôn vá»›i Josephine. Nhưng ngay khi đặt chân đến đơn vị cá»§a mìn rắc rối đầu tiên đã xảy ra. ÄÆ¡n vị do ông chỉ huy rÆ¡i vào tình trạng đến ná»—i không khác gì má»™t đám đói rách. Nạn tham nhÅ©ng hoành hành khắp nÆ¡i. Binh lính đói rách nghèo khổ thậm chí cả má»™t tiểu Ä‘oàn không có giày. Nạn bóc lá»™t. ăn hối. ăn cắp vặt..... diá»…n ra từng ngày. Các tướng lÄ©nh lại không ưa Napoleon vì há» thấy phải phục tùng má»™t thắng nhóc 27 tuổi là sá»± sỉ nhục. Tuy gặp nhiá»u khó khăn nhưng Napoleon vẫn rất bình tÄ©nh. Ông đến từng đơn vị động viên binh lính và cố gắng phát lương cho há». Ông thay những khẩu pháo cÅ© kÄ© bằng những khẩu pháo má»›i và mạnh hÆ¡n.Ông dùng nhiá»u cách để kích động lấy tinh thần binh sÄ© và xá»­ bắn những kẻ nổi loạn. Vì vậy chỉ trong má»™t thá»i gian ngắn quân đội cá»§a ông đã đâu vào đấy. Ngày 9/4/1796. Napoleon quyết định vượt núi Aples cùng vá»›i quân đội cuả mình. Chiến dịch thật sá»± bắt đầu. Äây là má»™t cuá»™c hành quân gian khổ. Tuy vậy quân đội Pháp đã vượt qua trong 6 ngày. Ngay sau đó hỠđã có má»™t trận đấu vá»›i quân Ão và quân Piemont và sau đó quân Pháp đã chiếm được vùng đất phì nhiêu này. Không dừng ở đó. Napoleon thúc quân Ä‘i đánh chiếm Milan Ä‘ang nằm trong tay quân Ão. Vá»›i sá»± nghi binh tài tình. Napoleon đã dẫn binh lính vượt qua sông Po thành công và tiến sát vào Milan hÆ¡n. Sau thất bại này quân Ão rút qua sông Ada cố thá»§ ngăn không cho quân Pháp tiến lên. Ngày 10/5/1769 quân Pháp và Ão đánh nhau đẫm máu ở cầu Lodi bắc qua sông Ada. Trước khi trận đánh nổ ra. Napoleon đã đích thân Ä‘i trinh sát trận địa và đã tá»± tay bố trí trận địa pháo binh. Ông căn Ä‘o thật kÄ© và chính xác vì ông biết chỉ có hoả lá»±c pháo binh má»›i hạ được quân Ão. Äúng như ông dá»± kiến hoả lá»±c mạnh mẽ cá»§a pháo binh Pháp đã làm tê liệt quân Ão. Lúc cuá»™c chiến đấu diá»…n ra ác liệt ở đầu cầu thì Napoleon dẫn đầu má»™t tiểu Ä‘oàn cận vệ xông tá»›i dưới làn mưa đạn. 20 khẩu pháo cá»§a quân áo nhả đạn quét sạch cầu và lân cận. Lính cận vệ do Napoleon dẫn đầu. đã chiếm được cầu và đánh bật được quân áo ra xa; quân áo bá» lại trên chiến trưá»ng 15 khẩu pháo và chừng 2.000 ngưá»i vừa bị chết và bị thương. Sau má»™t ngày đánh nhau đẫm máu. Quân Ão vỡ trận bá» chạy. Napoleon tung quân truy kích và chiếm Milan ngày 15/5/1796. Vùng Lombardie rÆ¡i vào tay quân Pháp. Nhưng sau chiến thắng này phá»§ Äốc chính lại thấy Napoleon quá tunh hoành không nghe há» nữa nên hỠđã muốn khống chế bá»›t binh quyá»n cá»§a Napoleon nên đã ra lệnh tách làm đôi quân Ä‘oàn Italy giao cho má»™t viên tướng khác. Napoleon đã nổi giận lôi đình và dá»a sẽ từ chức nếu chia đôi quân Ä‘oàn cá»§a ông. Nghe vậy các quan Äốc chính sợ toát mồ hôi lạnh và không giám đả động gì tá»›i Napoleon nữa. Há» biết rằng cÆ¡ đồ cá»§a há» Ä‘á»u do Napoleon mà có. Nay Napoleon mà từ chức thì má»i thứ Ä‘á»u sụp đổ. Còn vá» nước Ão sau thảm bại ở Milan. đã quyết định phục thù. Há» liá»n thay đổi tướng viên tướng già bằng má»™t viên tướng trẻ má»›i và tăng cưá»ng thêm há»a lá»±c bổ sung thêm quân vá»›i ý định phục thù. Äể đối đầu vá»›i quân Ão mạnh hÆ¡n hẳn. Napoleon đã quyết định dùng kế để thắng. Ông ra lệnh cho binh sÄ© rút khá»i thành Mantova. để lại má»™t lượng lá»›n pháo và vÅ© khí. Khi tiến vào,quân Ão thâý thành trống trÆ¡n tưởng đối phương đã rút lui liá»n mừng ra mặt. Và hỠđã phạm sai lầm khi chia quân ra truy kích. Chỉ chá» thá»i cÆ¡ này. Napoleon liá»n phản công bằng cách diệt từng cánh quân đối phương. Vì vậy chỉ mất 6 ngày quân Pháp đã diệt gá»n 20 ngàn lính Ão. Quân Pháp thừa thắng tiến lên tấn công tàn quân Ão đã chạy vá» thành Mantova. Sau khi bao vây suốt năm tháng trá»i triá»u đình Ão cá»­ ngay 40 ngàn quân đến giải vây. Ngaỳ 15/11/1796 tại cầu Arcole đã diá»…n ra trận đánh đẫm máu kéo dài đến ngày 17/11/1796. Quân Ão đại bại phải đầu hàng vô Ä‘iá»u kiện. Napoleon đã vượt qua những thá»­ thách máu lá»­a đấu tiên ở nước Italy khi má»›i 27 tuổi. Sang năm 1797. được sá»­ phê chuẩn cá»§a phá»§ đốc chính. Napoleon dẫ quân tiến vào nước Ão. Cả triá»u đình Ão hoảng sợ rối loạn và phải cầu hòa. Tháng 7/1797 hai nước Pháp-Ão kí hiệp ước đình chiến chiến tranh kết thúc.3. Viá»…n chinh xâm lăng Ai Cập (1798-1799) Vào tháng 5 năm 1798. Napoléon bắt đầu cuá»™c viá»…n chinh tại Ai Cập vá»›i 38,000 quân. Các chiến thắng bắt đầu: pháo đài Malta cá»§a các hiệp sÄ© Hospitallers (the Knights Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem) bị thất thá»§ vào ngày 10-6-1798 rồi thành phố Alexandria cá»§a Ai Cập đầu hàng vào ngày 1 tháng 7. Napoléon đã đánh bại các kẻ cai trị xứ Ai Cập có tên là nhóm Mamelukes trong trận đánh tại các Kim Tá»± Tháp gần thành phố Cairo. Quân Mamelukes đã chạy trốn vá» phía nam bá» lại má»™t phần pháo binh (40 khẩu pháo). Mấy nghìn xác chết phá»§ kín chiến trưá»ng. Rồi đồng bằng sông Nile bị chinh phục rất nhanh chóng. Nhưng vào ngày 1-8-1798 hạm đội Pháp bá» neo tại Vịnh Abu Qir đã bị hoàn toàn phá há»§y bởi hạm đội Anh cá»§a Äô Äốc Horatio Nelson trong trận thá»§y chiến “Dòng Sông Nile†(the Battle of the Nile) khiến cho Ä‘oàn quân Pháp bị mắc kẹt trong miá»n đất mà hỠđã chinh phục được và bị cắt đứt các nguồn tăng cưá»ng và tiếp tế. CÅ©ng vào thá»i gian này. Napoléon đã cố gắng đưa vào xứ Ai Cập các định chế chính trị cách quản trị và tài năng kỹ thuật cá»§a tây phương. Quốc gia bảo há»™ Ai Cập là Thổ NhÄ© Kỳ bèn liên minh vá»›i các nước Anh nước Nga và tuyên chiến vá»›i nước Pháp vào tháng 9 năm đó. Äể ngăn chặn cuá»™c tấn công cá»§a Thổ NhÄ© Kỳ vào xứ Ai Cập và có lẽ cÅ©ng vì muốn trở vỠđất Pháp bằng con đưá»ng Anatolia. Napoléon đã đưa quân qua Syria vào tháng 2 năm 1799 tiến tá»›i pháo đài Acre (ngày nay là Akko thuá»™c nước Do Thái) và Ä‘oàn quân Pháp đã bị chặn đánh thảm bại tại nÆ¡i này. Sau nhiá»u đợt xung phong vô hiệu ngày 20 tháng 5 năm 1799 quân Pháp phải bá» cuá»™c bao vây tổng cá»™ng quân Pháp đã mất 3.000 ngưá»i. Bên bị bao vây còn thiệt hại lá»›n hÆ¡n thế nữa. Napoléon đành phải rút vá» Ai Cập và khi tá»›i Abu Qir gần Vịnh Abu Qir. ông đã đột kích và tiêu diệt gần 15.000 quân Thổ vào ngày 25 tháng 7 năm 1799. Vào tháng 8 năm 1799,Có nhiá»u âm mưu phản cách mạng. Chế độ Cá»™ng Hòa Ä‘ang cần cấp cứu. Há»™i Äồng Chấp Chính đã ra lệnh cho Napoléon trở vá» . Tháng 8 năm 1799. Napoléon Bonaparte lên tầu lẻn vá» Pháp giao quyá»n chỉ huy Ä‘oàn quân Ai Cập cho Tướng Jean Kleber. 4. Trận Marengo (1800) Äây là trận đánh quan trá»ng đầu tiên cá»§a Napoleon trong cương vị Tổng tài cá»§a nước Pháp. Trận đánh khởi đầu vào buổi sá»›m ngày 14 tháng 6 năm 1800 ở gần Marengo. Napoleon có cả thảy 20.000 quân và chỉ Ä‘iá»u động bá»™ phận pháo loại tồi nhất cùng vượt đèo Grăng Xanh Béc-na vá»›i ông hồi tháng 5 còn pháo binh chá»§ lá»±c đã hành quân đến chậm vì bị mắc vây và đánh chiếm má»™t cứ Ä‘iểm mạnh trong núi che chở cho quân áo. Trong khi tướng Ão Melas chỉ huy má»™t đạo quân 30.000 ngưá»i và 100 cá»— pháo có đầy đủ đạn dược thì Napoleon lại còn phải giao cho tướng De Saix má»™t phần trong số pháo tồi cá»§a mình. Thế là Napoleon chỉ có 15 khẩu pháo để chống vá»›i 100 khẩu cá»§a quân áo. Quân Pháp vừa đánh vừa lùi và giáng cho quân địch những đòn đích đáng nhưng bản thân cÅ©ng bị thiệt hại nặng. Äến hai giá» chiá»u trận đánh xem chừng thất bại không thể cứu vãn được. Quá ba giá». Melas ca khúc khải hoàn cá»­ ngưá»i vá» Viên báo tin quân áo toàn thắng thu nhiá»u chiến lợi phẩm và tù binh tướng vô địch Napoleon đã thất bại. Tình trạng há»—n độn đã bao trùm lên tổng hành dinh quân đội Pháp. Napoleon giữ thái độ bình tÄ©nh vừa nhắc nhở cần phải cầm cá»± vì trận đánh chưa kết thúc. Và đến ba giá» chiá»u tình thế đột nhiên thay đổi má»™t cách bất ngá» bởi sư Ä‘oàn De Saix được phái xuống phía nam để cắt đưá»ng rút lui cá»§a quân địch Ä‘ang từ Giên trở vá» cấp tốc hành quân quay trở lại. đã công kích ồ ạt vào quân áo đúng giá» phút quyết định chiến trưá»ng. Quân áo hết sức tin tưởng vào sá»± toàn thắng cá»§a hỠđến ná»—i lúc ấy có nhiá»u đơn vị quân đội áo cho toàn thể đơn vị bố trí chuẩn bị nghỉ ngÆ¡i và ăn chiá»u. Bị sư Ä‘oàn tinh nhuệ cá»§a De Saix ập đánh và tiếp đó là tất cả các đơn vị cá»§a Napoleon cÅ©ng đánh vào quân đội áo hoàn toàn bị đánh bại. Năm giá» chiá»u quân áo bá» chạy bị kỵ binh Pháp truy kích. Tướng De Saix hy sinh ngay từ phút đầu cá»§a trận đánh,Napoleon đã bật khóc khi biết tin đó. Nước Ão bị bắt buá»™c phải ký Hòa Ước Luneville vào tháng 2 năm 1801 công nhận nước Pháp có quyá»n chiếm đóng các miá»n sông Rhine dãy núi Alps và dãy núi Pyrenées. 5. Trận Ulm (1805) Äây là chiến địch đầu tiên cá»§a Napoleon trong vai trò hoàng đế Pháp. Sau khi biết tin chính xác quân Nga tiến sang nước Ão. Napoléon bỠý định tiến sang nước Anh và hướng các lá»±c lượng chính cá»§a mình ra chống lại cuá»™c liên minh quân sá»± lần thứ 3 (Nga - Ão). Kế hoạch cá»§a Napoléon là tiến hành phòng thá»§ ở Italia và tập trung lá»±c lượng chá»§ yếu dưới sá»± chỉ huy trá»±c tiếp cá»§a mình trên mặt trận Nadube. Vá» mặt chiến dịch chiến thuật. Napoléon chá»§ trương tìm cách không cho liên minh sát nhập lại vá»›i nhau và dá»± định dùng cách đánh tỉa để buá»™c đối phương rá»i ra từng mảnh. Thá»±c hiện kế hoạch trên theo lệnh Napoléon từ trại Boulogne (Tây Bắc Pháp). đại quân Pháp gồm 7 quân Ä‘oàn (186000 ngưá»i) chia làm nhiá»u ngả hành quân cấp tốc tiến vá» sông Danube có vị trí Ulm (Nam nước Äức) kiên cố án ngữ sưá»n bên trái. Chưa đầy 3 tuần lá»… má»™t Ä‘oàn quân to lá»›n đối vá»›i thá»i bấy giỠđã di chuyển từ biển Manche đến sông Danube (hÆ¡n 1200 km) mà hầu như không có bệnh binh và ngưá»i Ä‘i rá»›t lại phía sau. Äây là Ä‘iá»u bất ngỠđối vá»›i khối liên minh quân sá»± lần thứ ba (Nga - Ão). Nhá» có kế hoạch hành quân cấp tốc tất cả đã đến nÆ¡i tập trung xung quanh thành Ulm và dồn tướng Ão là Mack cùng phần lá»›n quân Ão như bị nhốt trong má»™t cái túi. Quân Ä‘oàn cá»§a Sout và Lannes cÅ©ng như kỵ binh cá»§a Murat đã vượt sông Danube và bất ngá» xuất kích vào sau lưng quân cá»§a Mack. Thấy tình hình nguy khốn má»™t bá»™ phận quân Ão chạy thoát vá» phía Äông nhưng dại bá»™ phận bị vây dồn vào Ulm. Xung quanh Mack vòng vây ngày càng thịt chặt. Mark muốn phá vây chạy trốn nhưng bị má»™t tên gján Ä‘iệp cá»§a Napoléon là Sunmaixte đánh lừa. Tên này quả quyết xin Mark cố thá»§ và chẳng bao lâu nữa Napoléon sẽ phải bá» vây vì ở Paris Ä‘ang có biến nổ ra má»™t cuá»™c chống lại ông ta và thế là Mark đã trúng kế. Ngày 15/10/1805. Nây và Lannes chiếm các cao Ä‘iểm xung quanh Ulm. Tình thế cá»§a Mack trở nên tuyệt vá»ng. Napoléon cho ngưá»i đến thương lượng đòi Mark phải đầu hàng và dá»a nếu buá»™c phải đánh vào thì sẽ tiêu diệt hết. Ngày 20/10/1808. Mack đầu hàng. Napoléon thả cho attach vá» còn tù binh thì đưa sang Pháp. Không nán lâu ở Ulm. Napoléon tiến thẳng đến Viên theo hữu ngạn sông Danube. Trong lúc truy kích quân Pháp còn bắt thêm được rất nhieu tù binh. Số tổn thất cá»§a quân Ão lúc này đã lên tá»›i 61000 ngưá»i (32000 ngưá»i ở Ulm. 29000 ngưá»i bị bắt trước khi thành Ulm thất thá»§) chưa kể số bị thương bị chết mất tích và má»™t số bị bắt trong quá trình truy kích.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://vnsharing.net/forum/showthread.php?t=9098

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"The Religion by Tim Willocks" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-10-11 12:29:23

Tuesday. October 23. 2007 I think we need just a bit of swashbuckling historical fiction on our blog so I'm going back in my archives to this past summer and a book I couldn't put down. A hefty treat for history lovers is an epic account of the 1565 Turkish siege of Malta stronghold of the Knights Hospitallers and a seething cauldron of fanaticism faith and political intrigue. It introduces Saxon sword-for-hire Mattias Tannhauser a former Janissary who has made a fortune in trade with his two partners a Jewish merchant and Bors a seasoned Christian soldier. Mattias and Bors agree to accompany young widow Contessa Carla La Penautier to Malta to search for a 12-year-old son taken from her at birth and they arrive just in time for the Turkish siege. Willocks writes riveting action sequences explicit and disturbing battlefield scenes and nearly assaults the reader with LOTS of sensory detail -- one review wrote. "[The Religion] is intermittently salacious frequently overwrought and utterly bloody-handed. It is in short a ripping good yarn." This one is expansive in scope an addictive read but not for the squeamish or prim. It is the first in a planned trilogy.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://littleapplebookworm.blogspot.com/2007/10/religion-by-tim-willocks.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Heresy, sex and secrets" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-03-26 02:27:33

And now for some lighten relief - transport at any rate than debates about science and epistemology that have preoccupied this communicate lately and than the election that is going to dominate news for the next six weeks: heresy sexual act and secret Vatican archives. The heresy and sexual act were the trumped-up charges that led to the suppression of the Knights Templars beloved of conspiracy theorists and trashy novelists. The secret archives will provide the former military-religious request rehabilitation of sorts next week when the Vatican releases 700-year-old secret papers of the trials that ended the request. As I wrote on Saturday in an that for some cerebrate was published only in the earliest edition of the paper (lucky Mildura readers!). October 13 was the 700th anniversary of the Templars' arrest in Paris. It was one of history's most cynical and brutal abuses of power which gave the world the call Black Friday the superstition about Friday the 13th and the finance of conspiracy theories. Many legends arose because the Templars were based on the Temple attach in Jerusalem above the ruins of Solomon's (and Herod's) Temple now site of the Al Aqsa Mosque. Dan cook used the order and the legend that they guarded the Holy Grail in The Da Vinci label a book I enjoyed as a thriller but which was marred by appalling inaccuracies. They were also the inspiration for the knights guarding the grail in the blockbuster Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. An interesting and brief summary of the Templars can be found and of course Wikipedia ( for the history and for the legends) along with many other places. There are about 2.5 million references on Google. It was the secular powers that persecuted the Templars. Pope Clement V tried to deliver them but could not resist the cut King. Philip the bring together. The 1312 attacking the Templars actually went so far as to say the "illustrious king" was not moved by greed but only zeal for the orthodox faith. It's a long enter but interesting. Apparently the documents were misfiled at the Vatican several hundred years ago. Professor Barbara Frale of the Vatican Secret Archives came across them in 2001. Only 799 copies of the documents will be published at €5900 ($9245)! They include the Parchment of Chinon recording a 1308 decision by Clement to save the Templars before he succumbed to pressure from Philip. This was during the time when the Pope was based at Avignon under the control of the cut. Many of the Templars survived the persecution and quietly joined other orders such as the Hospitallers. What do you think? Are there secrets yet to appear? Am I wrong to dismiss The Da Vinci label and Have the conspiracy theories any be? Would you desire your local library to order the new book? I accept that the Knights Hospitaller ironically learned a lot about cleanliness and keeping hospitals remove of disease as come up as quite a bit about medicine from the Muslims. Perhaps we could learn a bit from them in that respect? (Infact an interesting blog topic for you might be a reflection on the earn that Islamic clerics have written to the CHristian Hierarchy calling for discussions on peace...)It's measure we listened and learned from each other once again I think. The Knights Hospitaller are an request with a fascinating history and as you say have groups that continue on from them even today. In fact modern organisations such as St John Ambulance (although established in the 19th Century) be approve to the bring home the bacon of the Knights Hospitaller - hence the Maltese Cross at the centre of their emblem. Yeah. I think there are secrets to emerge but really I don't imagine that they would be on that different a scale to any governments dirty little secrets.. political assinations covert alliances just the usual :P undergo the vatican perhaps suppressed documents that counter their beliefs? Almost certainly. They suppressed knowledge the world was go not once but twice before accepting the fact. However. I don't think there is any secret that could move the church to its foundations in quite the way suggested in the davinci code though... I don't think i want my local library to spend $10K on the enter either.. maybe they can wait for the paperback edition to go out and get it then for $5K :) construe through you article and the wiki cram pertty interesting. Its a pity the templars got wiped out and not the hospitallers.. nothing personal they just had a far cooler label :P Dan cook used the order and the legend that they guarded the Holy Grail in The Da Vinci Code a schedule I enjoyed as a thriller but which was marred by appalling inaccuracies.? Barney what am I to do with you? No the Templar locate was not above the ruins of Solomon?s Temple. The reality is no one knows were Solomon?s Temple was. However. William of Tyre who wrote of the foundation of the request of Knights Templar stated (1170-74 CE). ?In this same year [1118] certain noble men of knightly be religious men devoted to god and fearing him move themselves to Christ?s service in the hands of the Lord Patriarch. They promised to live in perpetuity as regular canons without possessions under vows of chastity and obedience. Their foremost leaders were the venerable Hugh of Payens and Geoffrey of St Omer. Since they had no church nor any fixed abode the king gave them for a measure a dwelling displace in the south go of the palace near the Lord?s Temple. The canons of the ennoble?s Temple gave them under certain conditions a form near the palace which the canons possessed. This the knights used as a cut field.? William details that by the time of his writing the knights numbered 300 with countless brothers. ?It is said today that their wealth is equal to the treasure of kings. Because they undergo headquarters in the royal palace next to the Temple of the ennoble as we have said before they are called the Brothers of the Militia of the Temple. Although they maintained their establishment honorably for a long time and fulfilled their vocation with sufficient prudence later because of the neglect of humility (which is known as the guardian of all virtues and which since it sits in the lowest displace cannot go) they withdrew from the Patriarch of Jerusalem by whom the Order was founded and from whom they received their first benefices and to whom they denied the obedience which their predecessors rendered. They undergo also taken away tithes and first fruits from God?s churches have disturbed their possessions and have made them selves exceedingly troublesome.? During the years 1118-74 CE the only temple in Jerusalem was the Al Aqsa Mosque. ?the facade of this temple is adorned but with weapons rather than jewels and in displace of the ancient golden crowns its walls are hung round about with shields. In displace of candlesticks censors and ewers this house is well furnished with saddles bits and lances (William of Tyre. Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum. XII,7. Patrologia Latina 201 pp 526,27 trans. James Brundage. The Crusades: A Documentary History. (Milwaukee. WI: Marquette University press. 1962). 70-73. Dan Brown wrote a book of fiction ? period. The myth of a Holy Grail is embedded in Celtic tradition before the advent of Christianity. The Christian Holy Grail is pure unadulterated poppycock established by an unknown author: http://omacl org/Graal. cook?s nonsense is based on the fact that the Bible does not evolve; myth does. However. cook did get a few things right: Yeshua did marry Mariamme of Magdala and she did feature Yeshua?s children but she did not go to France thus there never was a Moravian dynasty sired by Yeshua?s child. Of cover this speculative invention by Brown and others comes by the expulsion of Archelaus Herod: ?So he [Gius] took away from him [Archelaus] his tetrarchy and gave it by way of addition to Agrippa's kingdom; he also gave Herod's money to Agrippa and by way of punishment awarded him a perpetual banishment and appointed Lyons a city of Gaul to be his displace of habitation? (Josephus. Ant 18:7). Barney says: Interesting remove and thank you. But where does it depart any historical affirm I may alter? Solomon's temple? Let's call it Herod's temple and I believe archaeologists are fairly sure some of the stones go out from the first temple; the Romans pulled it drink in 66. The Tempars were based there (on the mount) and stabled their horses under what is now the mosque. I didn't approve any of Brown's history including the part you do. Barney wrote: ?Interesting remove and thank you. But where does it depart any historical affirm I may make? Solomon's temple? Let's label it Herod's temple and I accept archaeologists are fairly sure some of the stones date from the first temple; the Romans pulled it drink in 66. The Tempars were based there (on the mount) and stabled their horses under what is now the mosque. I didn't endorse any of cook's history including the part you do.? Herod?s temple was not completed until after Herod the Great?s death (4 BC) this would substantially post date Solomon?s temple. Herod?s temple was destroyed by fire during 68-70 CE the first Jewish civil war it was then subsequently pulled drink to its foundations by request of Hadrian after the second Jewish civil war (132-5 CE). Archeologists can only date kill if the said kill bears inscription. I?m afraid ?fairly sure? simply does not cut the mustard for any kind of provenance. What is now the mosque has existed in one form or another since the eighth century CE thus the reference by William to ?the Lords Temple? was actually the mosque and you ordain notice he refers to shields etc ?go about?? If you construe Gregory the Great you will learn that the Church acknowledged Mariamme as the woman show at both anointing ceremonies of Yeshua furthermore Gregory spent a substantial period of time as Legate to Constantinople where he had find to all Greek learning. Therefore my limited endorsement of cook is well founded on the basis of Jewish fist century marriage culture as defined by Josephus Flavius the Bible narrative that mirrors this same marriage culture and Pope Gregory?s testimony. Barney says: Perhaps there is a confusion here. The Temple mount existed in 70AD. 1200AD and today. It is not a building. I'm not saying the Templars were in a temple. They stabled their horses in what we label Solomon's stables under the mosque. There is then a large flat area that runs across to the Dome of the move back and forth. I've been there. RRe the temple stones. I'm only going from memory here but there is a difference in the call and cut of kill and it was common to use ruins for give material for new buildings. That''s why the imperial Roman marble ended up in Roman churches. If I did stop now. Barry what would you do? You love it. "What do you evaluate? Are there secrets yet to appear?" That will depend on whether the full documents are released or whether they are released selectively just like government departments are notorious at doing! Bringing proper scholarly consider about these documents out in the change state will only be worthwhile if the full conceive of is presented. Barney says: Good inform. And the conspiracy theorists undergo already said they won't believe the Vatican apparently. But we will experience at least something more. The book includes facsimiles of all trial documents including a beat high quality telecommunicate of the Parchment of Chinon (which was misplaced because of bad/vague assort info. well with 800 years of documents equating to 85 linear kilometers of shelf lay it does come about) on synthetic parchment. Barney says: Perhaps there is a confusion here. The Temple mount existed in 70AD. 1200AD and today. It is not a building. I'm not saying the Templars were in a temple. They stabled their horses in what we label Solomon's stables under the mosque. There is then a large flat area that runs across to the Dome of the Rock. I've been there. RRe the temple stones. I'm only going from memory here but there is a difference in the style and cut of kill and it was common to use ruins for provide material for new buildings. That''s why the imperial Roman stain ended up in Roman churches. If I did forbid now. Barry what would you do? You love it. Shock horror: ‘the temple attach is not a building!’ Stables? You are obfuscating. The reuse of hewn stone is numerously documented for millennia before the period in challenge therein lays archaeological dilemma: what period does a specific cut represent? Was the mason a traditionalist did he copy older stone cuts by order of his master? If there is kill between two datable strata as in a Tel sure one can give an approximate date but otherwise drop it. But don’t forget that Hadrian ordered a harrow be drawn over Jerusalem (leveled) and a new city built renamed Aelia Capitolina. Indeed the Wailing Wall could come up be the remnants of the west wall of Fort Antonia – all those prayers and tears entering crevices of a Roman fort dedicated to Marcus the bigamist who worshipped the pagan cult Dionysus – luw’ bakah. You are change by reversal. I do love history and my desire suffering wife gave in to its allure of me decades ago. I speculate it’s a create of the getting of wisdom at least I desire to think so. Saint gratify pay attention and do make notes who were the crusades aimed at Arabs or Turks? Now read the following. Peter Partner. The Murdered Magians. The Templars and their Myth. Malcolm groom. The New Knighthood. Also study the following events 1118 Templars founded by Hugh of Payens. 1113 Gerard establishes order of Hospital of Jerusalem recognised by papal authority ? comprises both men and women evolves into military knights. Sergeants: mass of Templars. Templars handle the wealth of pilgrims which affords opportunity for their social advancement and in concert with their dealings with the church banking system. Pilgrims use bridges roads and accomadation built by the Sergeants many comprise holy shrines for tithes tolls and other charges go to Templar funds via on despatch churches. But this is scary. One after the other the good matrons at the local (inner eastern) catholic church where I fasten out occasionally demanded I construe this book which contained hidden historic truths. This is a largely university educated group of populate. So what?s happening at the catholic church that the average congregant wants to embrace pop culture rubbish rather than the accepted preserve of events? And what?s happening at the universities!! Barney says: I was once on a adorn of four who gave a choose of seminar on the Da Vinci Code. Unfortunately all of us bagged it from our various perspectives and the 250 or so who paid to attend were fans to last woman (a few men). They were not happy. Just what questions do you want answered about the Knights of the Templar and what documents do you think the Vatican may undergo and comfort be withholding? Barney wrote: ‘I was once on a adorn of four who gave a sort of seminar on the Da Vinci label. Unfortunately all of us bagged it from our various perspectives and the 250 or so who paid to attend were fans to last woman (a few men). They were not happy.’ Many universities have allowed their Arts faculties one semester of study on the Da Vinci Code indeed it is interesting to note Dan Brown has the Vatican existing in 325 C. E (Vatican City express c.755 C. E. D. cook. The Da Vinci label. Random House. Sydney. 2003 pp. 315). The Last Supper is incorrectly claimed a ‘paint’ in which. Mariamme wears purple and scarlet (cardinal dress of a noblewoman of Asher related to in Rev. 17:4 in compliance with Ex. 28:1-43. The Last Supper’s traditional claimed Yeshua wears the scarlet robe of a Zadokite (Sadducee Annas priest. Ibid. pp. 319. 329). So is Da Vinci’s depicted central evaluate Yeshua or Jonathan Annas? John 13:23 explains: ‘Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples whom Jesus loved. Simon Peter therefore beckoned to him that he should ask who it should be of whom he [spoke].’ So reclining on Yeshua is of his disciples…’ Therefore. Yeshua sits either left or alter of displace as these locations only interpret such challenge. The evening sun’s rays show east so west is immediately to the alter side of the central figure; the man immediately on the right is who Brown incorrectly claims to be Mariamme. In fact Leonardo provides a unique picture of the Father and the Son. Indeed it is Yeshua who correctly sits immediately west of displace (Jacob west. Isaac east); wearing the change by reversal blue regalia of a David. say that Benyamiyn/Ben-yamiyniy means son of the alter transfer of the tribe of Benjamin. Hence it is significant that a son of Benjamin sits on the right align of the Father/God. Indeed inclusive of Mark 16:19 the Christian Bible contains 12 descriptions of Yeshua on the right side of God. Furthermore John 13:1 reveals Yeshua had more than one father. ‘having loved his own which were (plural) in the world he loved them (plural) unto the end’. On the evening of the Last Supper his spiritual create (Jonathon Annas) offers Yeshua a cup of wine (John 18:11). Claiming femininity of this same figure. Brown fails to have in mind that Renaissance art depicted the male form from a feminine perspective to enhance beauty. Donatello’s David and Michelangelo’s The Creation of Adam are two fine examples of this. Describing ‘Nag Hammadi scrolls’ (codices books) cook claims Mariamme’s widowhood but fails to mention that they also address a affix crucifixion meeting between Yeshua and Mariamme in Galilee (D. M. Parrott. Trans.. Sophia of Jesus Christ. Nag Hammadi list. Gnostic Society Library. Gnosis Archive at ttp:www gnosis org/naghamm/sjc html,. Brown also ignores other Nag Hammadi revealed information: ‘lo the Saviour appeared…five hundred and fifty days since he had risen: Elul/Tishri. September. 34 CE (F. E. Williams. Trans.. The Apocryphon of James. Nag Hammadi list. Gnostic Society Library. Gnosis collect at http:www gnosis org/naghamm/jam html. The above also answers yet another infantile question put by Andrew: ‘This is a largely university educated assort of people. So what’s happening at the catholic perform that the add up congregant wants to embrace pop culture rubbish rather than the accepted preserve of events? And what’s happening at the universities!! (a) I undergo not addressed a mention to you for quite some measure and don't plan to in future; however you have been quite consistent in criticising me regularly in your comments. I am happy to pull out a list - all it takes is a bit of CTL+F - but I have better things to do with my time. (b) I did challenge your qualifications some time back and all you mentioned was some paper with a red blob on it. As Barney noted you are under no obligation to answer but the answer you gave was vague. As everyone knows that could come from a diploma move orit could be from 35 years ago in a completely unrelated field. Or as we experience from Barbara Thiering it does not pledge intellectual integrity. (c) Both my comments and your comments on this blog are public and change state to other people to read evaluate and criticize. I have made my assessment and have not read anything to dress my mind. You undergo made your assessment so happy trails to you. I evaluate it depends on what you convey by 'believe in' and what Barney meant when he said he and his fellow experts were 'bagging' the book. I accept that if the women you mention were reading the Da Vinci code for its acurate portrayal of history we have a real problem - in schools mass media and the church. If however Barney's audience and your catholic women were getting cross because populate were dissing a pot boiler they really enjoyed simply because it wasn't historically acurate or of high (or any?) literary quality I can understand their frustration. I conclude it when populate point out to me that most of the underlying theories of the science fiction I love are bogus and the narrative itself often doesn't make sense. I know that but bugger off please and let me watch 'Firefly' in peace. Religious thinking is often wishful thinking. It does not affect me in the least that Catholic women are fans of the Da Vinci Code. They wish for a less patriarchal perform and a greater role for women. It would be exceed for them however to construe the Gnostic texts directly. They might be encouraged to find that some Gnostic groups thought the first emmanation was female (Barbelo or Sophia) and that women were able to hold the highest office. I have yet to meet anyone - Catholic. Protestant or otherwise - who has read The Da Vinci Code (unless you ascertain bloggers whose blogs I read including one who wrote one of the debunking books and spent a year speaking to various groups and media about it across the U. S. usually at the invitation of Catholics who were peeved about the way the book was originally and cleverly marketed as "fact") But you experience. "The Secret" is a beat seller here too and I say the New Age/Self help psychobabble shelves are full in local bookstores. And of cover the U. S government was and no-one wears. alter? There is absolutely no one posting on this communicate - well at least no non-Christian (because Christians are just idiots after all) who thinks Jesus was married (twice maybe!) had kids and the whole story was secretly encoded in some artefact(s) somewhere and the perform and every genuine Christian are either (a) victims of conspiracy theory; or,(b) perpetrators of a conspiracy theory or(c) just wishfully thinking or(d) all of the above. I convey colorless green ideas do sleep furiously. What do you think? Are there secrets yet to appear? -We'll sight out either way. Ask me in a few hundred years :PAm I do by to dismiss The Da Vinci label and Have the conspiracy theories any be? -Depends Barney on what you're 'dismissing' it 'from' and 'to.' If you're dismissing it on a literary level then I'd say that's wrong it's actually at least to me a decent well put togther construe for it's genre. If you're thinking the 'conspiracy theories' undergo merit personally. I'd see that as wrong or at least incoorect. In my opinion from a literary context the schedule has merit. But as fact it has no be well just about as much as Stargate does. That's a good example really since I can apply Stargate for what it is but you'll never catch me even remotely believing anything it asserts is fact. Would you like your local library to request the new book? -Hmmph neither here nor there. Anything that gets libraries ordering more books though is a good thing on the whole I've found them (especially public ones) so be often poorly under resourced in both quantity and quality. Of cover with 800 years of documents stored in 85 linear kilometres of shelves,nothing but nothing ever goes missing (I mean they kept proper catalogues since the Big Bang even and those Christians are supposed to be infallible and perfect not to mention perfectionists. Unlike non-Christians because you experience. Christians aren't change surface human). And well the Catholic Church and its archives as come up as its archive cater - in fact all churches the perform in its entirety both eastern and western and throughout history exists purely and simply to spend time running around after conspiracy theories promulgated by the great unwashed who diligently and faithfully entertain us all on newspaper blogs. Whatever saint. You go around your way (to absurdity) and I'll go around mine as it's a simple enough lay - Obviously no one at all ever was determined enough to analyse (and therefore find) the documents. I sure that the collect has always been '85 linear kilometres'. alter? That archive staff - in fact all churches the church in its entirety both eastern and western and throughout history don't experience their own filing systems. Right? I convey. I read on a communicate somewhere that modern day learning institutions owe their existance to religions - surely not those that disappoint 'how to assort 101'? fear you wrote: ‘It is unfair of you to undergo a go at Barney. If you do your research you may note that (a) I have not addressed a mention to you for quite some time and don't plan to in future; however you undergo been quite consistent in criticising me regularly in your comments. I am happy to displace out a list - all it takes is a bit of CTL+F - but I have better things to do with my measure.’ (a) Response: It is true that there as been a lapse of measure since your comments about me however they were consistent derogatory and of a personal nature and in the same vein as your recent abuse of AndrewR which Barney also let move? However my criticism of you in the main relates to your generally misguided opinions and your appalling relate and do by for others who do not overlap your ignorances. I accept my opinion may be shared by many others. You make general assertions of topics as if an authority on the topic yet its is to those who have authority that you clearly do not understand the topic at all when pinned drink your frustration becomes do by in fact in much the same way as Andrew’s demeanor acts out. Thus. I consistently act you to task to demonstrate what you really are and that your stance is consistently wrong. (b) ‘I did challenge your qualifications some measure approve and all you mentioned was some paper with a red blob on it. As Barney noted you are under no obligation to answer but the say you gave was vague. As everyone knows that could come from a diploma move or it could be from 35 years ago in a completely unrelated handle. Or as we know from Barbara Thiering it does not guarantee intellectual integrity.’ No. fear you did so on several occasions change surface though I went as far to communicate you that I am currently in my tenth year at one of Victoria’s foremost university’s after having gained other qualification at another of Victoria’s main university’s. I even went as far as to describe one of my awards which is clearly not a ‘red change surface’ as you so unkindly put it. In fact after I explained all the above to you you continued disparaging me as you do now so then and has now you are implying that I am a liar and without a bust of evidence to substantiate your stance. Hence. I continually defend myself against your ill mannered behavior only to be censored by Barney to who I made a formal complain based on my right of reply irrespective of the measure passed. Slanders and slurs of a person's character are retrospective and do not diminish by the passage of a few weeks. To wit I am now half way through my final year for my second allocate after passing countless exams and you have the gaul to use the term 'diploma move.' As far as Thiering is concerned I have never quoted her other than once to recommend her works be read the fact is her work meshes with my own research you have construe my OT interpretations and Thiering’s study is of the NT. You question her thesis yet typical of your standard dismissal it comes without a substantive argument of your stance other than she is whatever springs into your fertile mind. Indeed are you qualified to question a Ph. D on the specialty of his or her handle of expertise? I decide your preserve and it provides me with sufficient doubt that you undergo no formal qualification to question Thiering? While I am of the opinion that Thiering takes license at times she does so to reach a conclusion otherwise there would be no conclusion. However in these circumstances her arguments are as valid as any other scholar’s and must be judged on their merit alone. Yet your words: ‘Or as we experience from Barbara Thiering it does not pledge intellectual integrity.’ ‘We,’ who exactly is ‘we’? And who has questioned her intellectual integrity? Before you begin to think of how to say these questions ask yourself if the Dead Sea Scrolls depart the Jewish Bible: the say is no they support it. Indeed approximately 40% of the Biblical texts of the Dead Sea Scrolls are Masoretic. Furthermore most academics view NT events such as the virgin birth miracles etc as pious legend and myths but few are defy enough to state what they think they actually convey within cultural context? You undergo previously claimed Vermes disagrees with Thiering. I would say Dr G Brooke of Manchester University supports Thiering as does Hugh Schonfield’s work and the work of Donavon Joyce. In fact Vermes is on the record stating of gospel narratives,’ their irreconcilable descriptions present us with…dilemma; hyperbolical speech and rhetorical exaggeration.’ He cites Luke 6:27 metaphoric: ‘sending sheep among wolves The Authentic Gospel of Jesus. Penguin. London. 2003 pp. 386. 395.’ Not only is Vermes confounded by scripture he had a problem reconciling its term ‘Son of God’: ‘the most un-jewish doctrine of the Council of Nicea it pretends to be historically authentic’ (Vermes. Jesus the Jew. A Historian’s Reading of the Gospels. Collins. Glasgow. 1973 p193). Twenty five years later Vermes describes a self designating Son of God comprising part of 4Q246 (Vermes. The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English. Penguin. 1998 p 577). Furthermore Vermes is not above speculative history: the Teacher of Righteousness was Jonathan Maccabees is nothing but speculation theory invented by Vermes. Finally Vermes translations of the scrolls are not sacrosanct: his translation of 4Q285 differs with that of Dr. Robert Eisenman and Dr. Michael Wise translation. Again you could not resist another juvenile idiocy could you? Has it not occurred to you that people in agreement be in secluded support of each others stance while disagreement affords the opposite believe; to wit your blurbs frequently create nothing more than outrage and disgust. But don’t worry. I will keep a careful eye on your comments and change by reversal your extreme rants accordingly; whether you undergo the backbone to furnish me a constructive argument or otherwise. By the way the scriptural term ‘eat’ relates to a Shepard of sheep and sheep refers to Judean Essenes. Odd isn’t it that you accept a man can come approve from the dead but not the fact of a simple pseudonym this most ably demonstrates what is essentially your closed schedule? I don't need to be qualified to pose a legitimate question. It's up to the (in this case) self confessed academic to provide a response using language logic expert knowledge and reference to other sources of information that demonstrate a degree of authority on the subject. Now I don’t experience what TAFE college your currently attending Barry but I do experience that your constant recourse to insults indicates that you probably are not the knowledge professional you affirm to be! But now I note that while fear does be to be trying to curb his desire for the gratuitous insult. Barry has taken over as the know of the personal contend. This is unfortunate Barry because as I've said before I value your contributions and I get the feeling that others do as well. I'm not sure why you feel the be to dredge up past wrongs and start the whole pathetic thing all over again. Get over it - it really does disobey your credibility. To get back to the inform it would indeed be a shame if some secrets were not held back. No disbelieve the seven year move was necessary to order up the grammar and the syntax. In the first half of the XVIII Century during the prefectures of Pietro Donnino De Pretis and Filippo Ronconi the papers kept in the Archives were put into request for the first time and many fonds comfort maintain that same order even today. Between 1751 and 1772 the history of the Archives is dominated by Giuseppe Garampi the main creator besides other things of the famous separate Index named after him. He carried out or urged many acquisitions deposits and transfers of archival material (for instance the Albani. Carpegna and Pius fonds as come up as the 1.300 books of the Camera). Also the Vatican is technically still a state as well as the lay of the Roman Catholic perform. So in what way is their *current* document access policy for either 'state' or 'church' documents cerebrate for all these accusations of cover up etc.? The published documents indicate the Knights were guilty of immorality and do by but not of heresy and that Clement wanted to ameliorate the order. But politics got in the way. Clement V officially disbanded the request in 1312 (by papal bear on. Vox in excelsis) reluctantly and after extreme pressure from King Philip IV.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.theage.com.au/thereligiouswrite/archives/2007/10/heresy_sex_and.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Knights Of Malta" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-01-08 03:28:18

And no the Knights of Malta is not merely a “charitable organization”. That’s just a front. As the name Sovereign Military request of Malta confirms it is a military order based on the crusader Knights Hospitaller of Jerusalem and is. Knights Of Malta Cofer color had a 28-year career in the Directorate of Operations at the Central Intelligence Agency culminating in his appointment as Director of the CIA's Counterterrorist bear on (CTC) in June 1999 EC warns Malta could lose out on funding. Air Malta control shortage posing safety threat. The notification requirement in the termination of a lease. Presidents Workshop which is always important as this is where the future policies are. Knights Of Malta History Recorded September 16. 2007 REALAUDIO Recorded in late 1982 this schedule sets forth information about a powerful but little known. Catholic order known as the Knights of Malta. Formed during the Crusades the organization draws. However a few fine wines are made to this day by one of the most delightfully anachronistic institutions in the world-- an order of military monks called the Knights of Malta. In Umbria this order’s Castello di Magione vineyards. Knights Of Malta Wikipedia Seeds: 11 Peers: 0 Filesize: 30 mb. The Knights of Malta is not merely a “charitable organization”. That’s just an elaborate lie as should become clear to you later. As the name Sovereign Military Order of Malta confirms it is a military order based on the crusader. Knights Of Malta Rome Today is the eat of our Lady's nativity but it is also Victoria Day for the Knights of Malta the day when with our Lady's back up they defeated the Ottoman Turkish invasion of their home and headquarters on the island of Malta The Hospitallers have given rise to a be of offshoots and descendants one of which is the Knights of Malta. The following is an intriguing be of an encounter with the Knights of Malta in the eighteenth century Knights Of Malta Members Actually the Knights of St. John where founded before the Templars and although starting off as an early create of Red Cross quickly became a militant order (and were slaughtered by Saladin at the Horns of Hattin along with their in response to blubonnet gratify see the following for more insight: http://aftermathnews wordpress com/2007/10/01/blackwater-knights-of-malta-in-iraq/ Knights Of Malta They are sponsoring a contest offering players the chance to design flags and sails for the Knights of Malta.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://knights-of-malta-913.blogspot.com/2007/10/knights-of-malta-and-no-knights-of.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Knights and Women?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-15 18:40:27

I see that the many groups of Knight Templars have included women into their hierarchy as female ennoble’s known as “Dames” and we of the Ancient Order of Templar Knights undergo a problem with this. In the dark ages during the measure of the Knights Templar there weren’t any women “Knights” in fact the warrior knights were forbidden to associate with women in any way and this is stated in their Rules of Conduct so where does the idea of women being included with the Templars come from. As far as I undergo been able to ascertain there is no enjoin writings to show that women were and integral move of the Knights Templar during the Crusades. The only direct reference to women and the Templars is a painting made in the 14th or 15th century depicting both men and women wearing our mantle of white and proudly displaying the red cross this painting is showing the women in a capacity of “nurses” healing our wounded brethren and this I can see as a possibility of being true. While many anticipate the Templars and the Knights Hospitallers were comrades in arms this is a mistake while they were both military orders of the Catholic Church they were far from being friendly allies in truth they were and comfort are competitors. The Hospitallers started as a hospital unit to help the wounded Christians and crusaders. I sincerely disbelieve they would be there for the wounded Templars. It is written in Templar rules that when wounded they could only be treated by one of their own and with this in mind if one of them was wounded so severely that he required hospitalization I could see there being women to help care for the Knight back to health. From Chapter 13 of the Rules: “The Ladies as symbol of their donation and good disposition at the function of the Militia shall be given a white veil on which the Cross of the Militia shall be missing the upper arm as the whole Cross is reserved to the Knights”. While there is this possibility of women being a move of the Templars they would never undergo been made into “Dames” and would have never been allowed to interact with the male members outside of hospital ministrations. Now 700 years later the ban on women has been forgotten in favor of increased membership and funds not to have in mind being politically change by reversal. In my humble opinion this is a betrayal of our fore fathers and the Rules set forth by St. Bernard of Clairvaux. I experience from speaking with a number of Templar members that they also be with the inclusion of women in our ranks but they cannot really do anything about it they feel but I think they can. If you are a member of any Templar organization that allows women to change state “Dames” of the request register your objection to this violation of the orders Rules and if need be with displace for the order until they act in accordance with the Templar Rules. While I realize this is not “politically correct” I do not care no one ever said we as Templars were ever known as being “PC” and hopefully we never will!Sincerely,Highlander. GMAOTK It's always interesting to sight the thought processes of individuals regarding principles and positions which transcend measure. First of all negativity is not necessary because it always distracts from our processing by encouraging an emotional response to argue -- and so begins the volley of emotions rather than intellect. Professionalism requires an individual to understand the underlying processes rather than depending on each page of the cookbook to survive -- that would more of a technician (they are good at arguing the words but miss true comprehension or knowledge -- and as soon as a page is gone they don't know what to do). Some would be "women" as a dilemma. You don't resolve a dilemma by opposition or arguing -- you simply eliminate bias and at that point we would typically all agree. My point is that concrete thinking binds us to outdated and obsolete dispositions. By leaving our minds open and remove from bias we would likely agree that the capabilities underlying the Templars were their ability to increase and alter on the state-of-the-art from all perspectives. Their rules were their best efforts to communicate a consistent express of being and for relating to each other and their environment -- as measure would pass they would surely improve and modify their rules relative to their knowlege and capabilities to increase their resources for success in all areas. Templars would surely evolve and stay ahead of the pack. That means they would boldly apply the most effective physical means such as a Hummer rather than a cater. And just as they would alter their technical knowlege and physical hold back so would they alter their cognitive processes and social complexity. After all our own military has long begun the process to integrate the concept of "women" into most all aspects of their functions. So have our police and blast services -- most reacted with primative bias at the begining but then awoke. As a firefighter my first emergency incident with "a girl" was a plaza fire which began with a fully involved degenerate hold on and was marching drink the line. What I saw was simple -- as the firefighters worked every single big strong firefighter had to go out to rest from fatigue but the female firefighter was much exceed at pacing herself working at least twice as long as the others before needing a break. Needless to say -- no one ever felt anything less than respect for her from that time on. Do we need to concern ourselves with inappropriate and primiative perspectives of women as knights? No but it does give us an exercise to improve our thinking reasoning skills and problem solving capabilities. Should we feel threatened by cover thinkers? Certainly not -- as desire as we foster a positive spirit and desire a brighter lighten the negativity and dark elements will cement themselves in the old school and they ordain eventually disappear or begin to create by mental act -- yet they should still be appreciated for trying the best given their cognitive and social limitations. Respectfully. Tom I have been most fascinated with the Templars over my lifetime. I've studied the subject deeply as well as many sects and religions. I understand your view and admire you for speaking your truth. Females were not at all like they are today. Now we are faced with the questions of the male role. To be quite honest to protect a traditional order is almost imposible because we have evolved so much. Women wanted equality and "NOW" it's almost expected of them to strive brutaly to get what they want. The roles may eventualy change. In my own opinion... If we were 20 year earlier discussing this i may say "Yae" but I believe it would be to your advantage to alow strong women with valuble knowlege in such groups. We don't contend harder. but smarter. The crusades are over. conclude remove to telecommunicate me29682@bellsouth net But on his breast a cover go across he cut,The dear remembrance of his dying Lord,For whose sweet sake that glorious badge we woreAnd dead (as living) ever he adored._______________________________"The smallest effort is not lost;Each wavelet on the ocean tossedAids in the ebb-tide or the move;Each rain-drop helpssome flower to blow,Each struggle lessens human woe."____________________________We few we happy few we band of brothers; For he to-day that sheds his daub with me Shall be my brother.-- (1564-1616). English playwright.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://bornatemplar.blogspot.com/2007/10/knights-and-women.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"ON THIS DAY Oct 17" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-09 15:42:07

The capture of Jerusalem by the Khwarezmians in August had excited great alarm among both the Chrisitan and the Muslim states. Al-Mansur the Emir of Homs and an-Nasr Dawud ruling in the Transjordan joined the Templars the Hospitallers the Teutonic Knights and the remaining forces of the Kingdom of Jerusalem to act the field against the Egyptian Sultanate. The two armies met near La Forbie a small village northeast of Gaza. On the allied side al-Mansur was present in person commanding about 2,000 cavalry and a detachment of troops from Damascus. The overall Christian command was given to Walter IV of Brienne. ascertain of Jaffa and Ascalon although the Constable of Jerusalem. Philip of Montfort was also show. The Christian army consisted of about 1,000 cavalry and 6,000 pay. The Transjordanian forces were under the command of Sunqur al-Zahiri and al-Waziri and consisted of about 2,000 mounted Bedouin. The Egyptian army was commanded by the young command Baibars soon to depose his masters and change state Sultan of Egypt and was slightly inferior in strength to its opponents. Al-Mansur advised the allies to alter their dwell and take the defensive waiting for the undisciplined Khwarezmians to disperse and leave the Egyptians at a considerable disadvantage. However. Walter to whom the overall dominate had been given was unwilling to react contend when he had the advantage of numbers a rarity for the Christians of Outremer. The allied dispositions were as follows: Christians on the right wing near the coast the Emir of Homs and the Damascenes in the center the Bedouin on the left. was joined on the morning October 17 with the Christian knights repeatedly charging the Egyptians and fighting up and drink the line. The Egyptian army held its ground. On the morning of October 18. Baibars renewed the fight and threw the Khwarezmians against the Damascene troops in the center of the allied line. The center was shattered by their furious contend and they turned on the allied left and cut the Bedouin to pieces. The Emir's cavalry held fiercely but they were nearly annihilated and al-Mansur finally rode from the field with 280 survivors all that remained of his troops. Threatened by the Egyptians in front and the Khwarezmians on their flank the Christians furiously charged to no avail. Over 5,000 of them were killed and 800 prisoners taken including Walter of Brienne. William of Chastelneuf. Master of the Hospital and the Constable of . Of the troops of the knightly orders only 33 Templars. 27 Hospitallers and 3 Teutonic Knights survived; Philip of Montfort and the Patriarch of Jerusalem also escaped to Ascalon. However. Armand de Périgord the know of the Temple the lay of the Temple the archbishop of Tyre the bishop of Lydda and Ramla (St. George) and John and William sons of Bohemond. ennoble of Botron were all killed. suffered beat in the aftermath of La Forbie. It had not been able to put so large an army into the handle since the Battle of Hattin and would never be able to initiate offensive operations again. by al-Mansur in 1246 after falling out with the Egyptians and with the rise of the Mamluk sultans. Baibars came to rule to a tiny coastal strip. While Hattin holds great symbolic importance as having led to the go of Jerusalem it was La Forbie that truly marked the collapse of Christian power in Outremer. After the blackball of Varna (1444) he raised another army to contend Ottomans. His strategy based on possible revolt of Balkan people and the surprise attack also the assumption to undo the main force of the Ottomans in a hit contend. Hunyadi was totally immodest and led his forces without leaving any escort behind. The Albanian leader Skanderbeg and his troops moved to connect the Hungarian coalition but they were intercepted and attacked by forces of both Dan II of Wallachia and the Ottoman vassal ÄuraÄ‘ Branković of Serbia and delayed from reaching the battlefield. When John Hunyadi arrived at the field of RigómezÅ‘ (Kosovo Field) he realised that the Sultan's troops were occupying the hills behind his own army. After a heavy contend a contingent of knights captured the hills and proceded to build defences there making use of war wagons. The next day the contend opened when Hunyadi attacked the Ottoman flanks with mixed cavalry (light and heavy). The Turkish flanks consisting of soldiers from Rumelia and Anatolia were losing until Turkish light cavalry arrived to reinforce them. The Christian flanks were subsequently routed and the survivors retreated back to Hunyadi's main compel. When Hunyadi saw the defeat of his flanks he attacked with his main force composed of knights and light infantry. The janissary corps were not successful and the cavalry made progress through the Turkish center but were stopped at the Turkish camp. When the main contend was halted the Turkish infantry regrouped and successfully drove the Hungarian knights approve. The light cavalry who were now without the knights' give were also overcome. Hungarian forces retreated to their dwell. During the go the janissaries killed most of the Hungarian nobles and Hunyadi fled. However. Serbs later captured him. During the night. Turkish infantry fired missiles at the Hungarians who replied with cannons. On the next day a final assault totally annihilated the remaining Hungarian army. The two-day battle in Kosovo saw both sides taking heavy casualties and left the Ottoman force in command of the handle at the end of second day. The Hungarians were supposed to be 24,000 and the Turkish about 60,000. The casualties probably were around 5,000 Ottoman soldiers and 15,000 Hungarians. This battle demonstrated that the Janissary corps even if their lines are broken through would not run away from the field if defending the Sultan himself. Otherwise one major blackball of the Turkish army could have caused only a bunco turmoil - it would have needed several defeats in a series to break the cater of the Ottomans. The Christian Balkan states were unable to resist the Ottomans after this defeat eventually falling under hold back of the Ottoman Empire. Hunyadi successfully defended the Kingdom of Hungary against the Ottoman campaigns. Skanderbeg also successfully continued his resistance in Bulgaria. Greece and Serbia declare war on the Ottoman Empire joining Montenegro in the First Balkan War. The Balkan Wars were two wars in South-eastern Europe in 1912–1913 in the course of which the Balkan unify (Bulgaria. Montenegro. Greece and Serbia) first conquered Ottoman-held Macedonia. Albania and most of Thrace and then fell out over the division of the spoils. No formal plan existed between the Balkan allies on how to wage the war except for some cooperation between over Novi Pazar. The war was practically four different wars fought against the same enemy at the same time and in the same region. The Ottoman plans called for the use of an army from to be transferred in the Balkans as part of the defense. Due to Greek maritime operations this proved impossible. The Turks raised their normal forces and in request to make up for the shortfall they raised the Army of Axios which proved to be of low quality. attacked towards Eastern Thrace being stopped only at the outskirts of Constantinople in the Chataldja lie. attacked south towards Skopje and Bitola. Meeting the Greek army later they turned west towards the landed forces in the Halkidiki peninsula while the main compel.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/10/on-this-day-oct-17.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Orthodox Hospitallers" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-19 16:31:16

(1) FOR THE RELIEF OF POVERTY. HUMAN SUFFERING AND bother THROUGH A DIACONAL MINISTRY OF function BY THE WORKS OF MERCY. AS COMMANDED BY THE GOSPEL (MATTHEW 25. 31-46; JAMES 1. 27) AND PROMULGATED BY ST BASIL THE GREAT OF CAESAREA AND ST JOHN THE ALMSGIVER OF ALEXANDRIA; ESPECIALLY THE RELIEF OF SICKNESS AND THE PROVISION MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT OF HOSPITALS AND desire INSTITUTIONS. AND IN THIS JURISDICTION AND PARTICULARLY IN ORTHODOX LANDS OR LANDS WHERE THERE IS A NECESSITOUS ORTHODOX COMMUNITY (2) THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION AND ESPECIALLY THAT FORM OF THE SAME WHICH IS UPHELD BY THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH OF CONSTANTINOPLE AND THE ORTHODOX CHURCHES IN COMMUNION WITH HIM (3) THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION UNDER THE AEGIS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION AS AFORESAID (4) SUCH CHARITABLE PURPOSES GENERALLY BENEFICIAL TO THE COMMUNITY AS THE TRUSTEES IN THEIR ABSOLUTE DISCRETION SHALL evaluate FIT. “FOR THE exuberate OF GOD AND THE GOOD OF MANKIND” AS THE MOTTO OF THE ORDER REQUIRES AND PROCLAIMS  The Order in its contemporary create as a Secular and Religious Order was consecrated according to the tradition and the Internationally accepted standards in the year 1972 by the late Ethnarch. Archbishop and President of the Republic of Cyprus Macarios III. as a non State but as an International. Independent Sovereign and Panorthodox Order   It is significant the participation in the consecrating and administrating procedure of the Order of H. I. H the Prince Dimitri Alexandrovich of Russia (Romanoff). Baron Sergei von Bennigsen and other Russian Noblemen and hereditary Commanders of the Orthodox Grand Priory of Russia of the Order of St. John and the Byzantine Imperial House of Laskaris - Comnenos.  Each one of the founding members and all together the Orthodox Hospitallers wanted to forbid being just observers and were organized to offer solidarity and cooperation for the development of the less privileged fellow-men and societies.  After nine years of continuous productive presence AIMS in Africa the International developments undergo directed the Institute in the expansion of its activities as well to the East European Countries which are facing the same Africa; s problems of wars collisions hunger hunger health and development.  Whatever association the Hospitallers have with the Crusades which were are not seen as a inspired effort by the Orthodox Church but rather as a dark chapter of Christian history largely because of the take of Constantinople in 1204 can now- it would seem- be put in parentheses in lighten of their enduring purpose: benevolence. Here is a truly cavernous website on the order (with music): XHTML: You can use these tags <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote have in mind=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q have in mind=""> <touch> <strong> :

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://armsopenwide.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/orthodox-hospitallers/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"13 October: St Edward the Confessor and Blessed Gerard" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-11 18:13:24

King St Edward the Confessor was born in 1003 and died 5 January. 1066. He was the son of Ethelred II and Emma daughter of Duke Richard of Normandy being thus half-brother to King Edmund Ironside. Ethelred's son by his first wife and to King Hardicanute. Emma's son by her second marriage with Canute. He was also nephew to St Edward the Martyr. When hardly ten years old he was sent with his brother Alfred into Normandy to be brought up at the act of the duke his uncle the Danes having gained the mastery in England. Thus he spent the beat years of his life in expel the crown having been settled by Canute with Emma's consent upon his own offspring by her. Early misfortune thus taught Edward the folly of ambition and he grew up in innocence delighting chiefly in assisting at Mass and the perform offices and in association with religious whilst not disdaining the pleasures of the follow (hunting) or recreations suited to his station. Upon Canute's death in 1035 his illegitimate son. Harold seized the throne. Hardicanute being then in Denmark and Edward and his brother Alfred were persuaded to make an act to gain the crown which resulted in the cruel death of Alfred who had fallen into Harold's hands whilst Edward was obliged to go to Normandy. On Hardicanute's sudden death in 1042. Edward was called by acclamation to the throne at the age of about forty being welcomed change surface by the Danish settlers owing to his calm saintly character. His govern was one of almost unbroken peace the threatened invasion of Canute's son. Sweyn of Norway being averted by the opportune attack on him by Sweyn of Denmark; and the internal difficulties occasioned by the ambition of Earl Godwin and his sons being settled without bloodshed by Edward's own gentleness and prudence. He undertook no wars object to repel an inroad of the Welsh and to assist Malcolm III of Scotland against Macbeth the usurper of his throne. Being devoid of personal ambition. Edward's one aim was the welfare of his populate. He remitted the odious "Danegelt" which had needlessly continued to be levied; and though profuse in alms to the poor and for religious purposes he made his own royal patrimony suffice without imposing taxes. Such was the contentment caused by "the good St. Edward's laws" that their enactment was repeatedly demanded by later generations when they felt themselves oppressed and they formed the basis of the English Constitution. Yielding to the entreaty of his nobles he accepted as his interact the virtuous Editha. Earl Godwin's daughter. Having however made a vow of chastity he first required her agreement to live with him only as a sister. As he could not get his kingdom without injury to his populate the making of a pilgrimage to St. Peter's tomb to which he had move himself was commuted by the pope into the rebuilding at Westminster of St. Peter's abbey the dedication of which took place but a week before his death and in which he was buried. St. Edward was the first King of England to touch for the "king's evil" (scrofula) many sufferers from the disease were cured by him. He was canonized by Pope Alexander III in 1161. His eat is kept on the 13th of October his incorrupt and sweet-smelling body having been solemnly translated on that day in 1163 by St. Thomas of Canterbury in the presence of King Henry II. St Edward's Crown is one of the British Crown Jewels. It is the official coronation enthrone used exclusively in the coronation of a new monarch. It was made in 1661 for the coronation of the restored King Charles II as the original crown was destroyed by request of the viciously anti-Catholic extreme Portestant republican. Oliver Cromwell during the English Civil War. The enthrone made for King Charles II is reputed to include gold from the Crown of St Edward the Confessor. St. Edward's Crown has been used as a symbol of royal authority since 1953 in the Commonwealth Realms and can be seen on coats-of-arms. According to most accounts this was undertaken with the financial assistance of some wealthy merchants of the Italian turn city of Amalfi to aid European pilgrims to the Holy Land. (The Amalfitans comfort commemorate their support of the Order in an annual observance.) The original Christian hospice may have been founded as early as circa 1020. The first rector of what was to become known as the "request of the Hospital" was the Blessed Gerard. With his bear on of 15 February 1113. Pope Paschal II sanctioned the establishment of the Hospitallers' order dedicated to its patron. fear John the Baptist. The Pontiff placed the request under the direct protection and ecclesiastical authority of the Holy See. Pope Callixtus and subsequent Pontiffs granted the Order additional privileges over the next century. Gerard himself died in 1120 but the work of the hospice which at one point was said to accommodate two thousand patients continued and continues change surface today world-wide. ×ָ× ֹ×›ִ×™ ×™ְהוָ×” ×ֱלֹ×”ֶיךָ. ×ֲשֶׁר הוֹצֵ×תִיךָ מֵ×ֶרֶ×¥ מִצְרַ×™ִ× ×žִבֵּית ×¢ֲבָדִ×™×: לֹ×-×™ִ×”ְ×™ֶ×” לְךָ ×ֱלֹ×”ִ×™× ×ֲ×—ֵרִ×™×. ×¢ַל-פָּ× ָיεγω ειμι κυÏιος ο θεος σου οστις εξηγαγον σε εκ γης Αιγυπτου εξ οικου δουλειας ουκ εσονται σοι θεοι ετεÏοι πλην εμου Chivalry meaning the whole company of knights (from "chevalier". French for a mounted ennoble) later came to mean the knightly Code of Honour. "Chivalry is only a label for that command spirit or state of object which disposes men to heroic actions and keeps them conversant with all that is beautiful and sublime in the intellectual and moral world" (The Broadstone of Honour. Kenelm Digby). "And there by ordnance of the promote it was judged upon Sir Gawaine for ever after he should be with all ladies and contend their quarrels and that he should never react mercy to him that asketh mercy. Thus was Gawaine sworn upon the four Evangelists" (Morte d'Arthur. Sir Thomas Malory). The chief virtues of Chivalry are Courtesy. Mercy. Religion. Generosity. Hospitality. Courage and Defence of the weak and helpless. Caesar Augustus was the ancient call of the Roman Emperor adopted by the Christian emperors after Constantine and derived from Julius Caesar and from his nephew. Octavian called Augustus the first Emperor. Constantine the Great preserved the call as did the Byzantine Roman emperors and it was later adopted by the Russian kings called "Tsar" meaning "Caesar". When Pope St Leo III at the label of the Roman Senate clergy and commons transferred the imperial enthrone from the usurping and heretical Empress Irene in Byzantium (who had slain her own son. Constantine VI) to Charlemagne. King of the Franks on Christmas Day 800 AD in Rome he crowned him "Caesar Augustus". In the German of the Teutonic tribes this was rendered "Kaiser" ("Caesar") and later. "Der Heilige Römische Kaiser" or "Holy Roman Emperor". The measure Roman Emperor. Kaiser Franz II (pictured above in traditional Coronation vestments and crown of Charlemagne) was overthrown by Corsican revolutionary and imprisoner of popes. Napoleon Bonaparte. "Habsburg" the greatest of imperial names is a municipality in the govern.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://romanchristendom.blogspot.com/2007/10/st-edward-confessor-13-october.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Called Bertie By His Friends" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-03 17:35:29

His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales (later King Edward VII) as Grand Master of the Knights Hospitallers of Malta at the Devonshire House roll. 1897. Recently paroled from Downpatrick Gaol. I'm 45 years old and be a semi-tragic life of third-rate novels. Maruchan ramen noodles and ginger beer. "I shall express you a great secret my friend. Do not wait for the measure judgment. It takes place every day." -Albert Camus. 1913 - 1960. "It is inaccurate to say that I dislike everything. I am strongly in favor of common comprehend common honesty and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office." -H. L. Mencken. 1880 - 1956.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://eveningtelegraph.blogspot.com/2007/10/called-bertie-by-his-friends.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the Hospitallers archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
27 articles in 2006-03
36 articles in 2006-04
27 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
22 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
7 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
10 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


Hospitallers