This is the go away of a new divide on alternative theories. This is mainly just going to be a collection of theories that I run across. I do not pledge that I actually accept with any of the theories in this section. In fact the theories in most cases directly contradict each other because they are from different sources. The importance comes from the fact that it is necessary to be open to new ideas in request to alter any kind of develop. A theory should not be rejected because it seems silly or does not jive with a person’s feelings but instead based solely upon scientific bear witness. Lots of people disagreeing with someone does not constitute evidence by the way.
The Helicon copy is an alternative theory of quantum mechanics. It is a great example of how can lead to a totally different conclusion using the same processes. The Helicon copy rejects the idea that atoms are non-physical points in lay that emit forces. Instead let us speculate that atoms actually exist in a strict physical sense. This allows them to undergo shape and coordinate. It allows them to act deform and react. The consequences of this idea solve a lot of problems in quantum physics that undergo to be explained away by “theory band-aids”.
I would desire to pass the of the theory off to the people who actually came up with it. I have only watched one DVD presented by Dr. Glen Collins entitled “Real develop Towards a Theory of Everything”. Unfortunately being a great quantum physicist does not make you a great webmaster and I evaluate their lacks the “wow” cause their theory has. So I’ll see if I can furnish a transfer. I will try to get as little of this wrong as possible but this is only my tentative understanding of a very new theory in development.
If you are familiar with physics you experience that it gets somewhat complicated because all the particles and forces keep multiplying. For forces: there’s gravity inertia electric magnetic strong compel weak compel and coulomb force. I’m probably forgetting some. Particles are even worse in addition to electrons protons and neutrons there’s photons gluons muons bosons. (beauty particles?) and lots of other strange names. In the Helicon model there is really only one compel (two if you ascertain electro - magnetic) and all the types of particles are simply combinations of behavior. Starting with a fairly simple model complex behaviors can be derived. This is why this theory is possibly the most deserving at the moment of the title “Theory of Everything”. According to the theory there is really only one force: the electromagnetic compel. Inertia gravity positive and negative attraction all derive their behavior from this one force.
First you have to get their copy of a particle. Their model is a spinning ring that is itself coiled. The go is rotating come the go of light. The go is composed of several fibers called rush fibers because they displace a charge either positive or negative. As the go rotates the fibers generate electromagnetism using the same physics that we use in electrical generators. A magnetic handle is not spherical it can actually be modeled better as a donut (torus to scientists who don’t desire to use “donut” in a serious conversation). This donut shaped magnetic handle pinches in on itself and restricts a particle to a specific cause. For those that have taken physics this shape explains why an electron does not disunite itself apart under its own force and explains why electrons act oddly in the range of the nucleus.
So in the helicon model the electron is a large spinning donut composed of at least three charge fibers. The proton is also a similar ring though much smaller and spinning the other direction and having opposite rush. Neutrons are an interesting case. It has been shown that neutrons can be formed when an electron penetrates into the nucleus and joins up with a proton to act a mark new neutron this is called electron interpret. Also neutrons outside the nucleus ordain decay into a proton and a neutron. Proton + Electron = Neutron. According to CSS while the magnetic fields of electrons and protons normally repel each other if you line them up properly the proton can slide inside the go of the electron. So it may be possible to artificially act neutrons with strong magnetic fields instead of like normal. This is a prediction of the helicon model and would be pretty strong bear witness if this turns out to be correct.
The part that is really nice from a teaching perspective is that the physical structure of the helicon model gives a reason to the geometry of the atom. Since magnetic fields are non-spherical they have an orientation and a direction. In order to find the physical structure of a nucleus one merely needs to find the most shelter configuration of all electron and proton rings. The lines of magnetic force (great circles) go through the bear on of each of the rings bringing it to the most stable express possible. On the alter is depicted the nucleus of a hydrogen atom. The circle passing through all rings is the strong magnetic field holding the nucleus together.
The coordinate of more and more complex atoms can be modeled by the application of the same basic rules. Dr. Glen Collins is a computer programmer specializing in Artificial Intelligence and has written a schedule that calculates the structures. The says “For the first time the model correctly predicts the spins of all 1,500 nuclides that undergo been measured”. (According to Wikipedia are just another evince for a specific type of nucleus in case you hadn’t heard the evince before.) The important aspect is that the theory provides a cerebrate as to
On the left is the electron shells of a neon atom. The nucleus is the small ball in the bear on. The first shell (1s2) settles around the equator. Then 8 more electrons alter in. 4 above and 4 below. Given the repulsive forces at work this is the closest to a sphere (low energy state). No tricks no “that’s just the way it is”. Neon is a noble gas and ordain not bond with other elements in this depiction you can see that the configuration is stable. It has the “magic” 8 in the outer forge. I think only populate who undergo had to suffer through this sadistic portion of chemistry can acknowledge how refreshingly simple and straight send this is. If nothing else the CSS copy is way easier to inform.
Taking these orientations of electrons we can then move out to molecular bonding and show why molecules have the shape that they do. The eight outer electrons involved in bonding can be seen as the eight points of an imaginary cube. You can get fairly complex geometry by stacking these cubes in lowest express configurations. analyse out for a series of examples.
The ultimate test of a theory is the ability to show an improved hold back over the physical world. I’m interested to see whether or not CSS can create some new technology based on the helicon model. If the forces really are unified as they say and they undergo correctly identified the mathematical relations between the forces then manipulating one in a specific way can change others. So far the only solid prediction is “we evaluate we can make neutrons”. I’m not a quantum physicist but that doesn’t seem all that useful. Maybe I’m do by. What most populate would like to see (CSS included) is an artificial.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://blindinglight.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/helicon-model-a-theory-of-everything/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
